Afficher la notice abrégée

Influence of Cognitive Functioning on Powered Mobility Device Use: Protocol for a Systematic Review

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorPELLICHERO, A.
dc.contributor.authorKENYON, L. K.
dc.contributor.authorBEST, K. L.
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorSORITA, Eric
IDREF: 176018689
dc.contributor.authorLAMONTAGNE, M. E.
dc.contributor.authorLAVOIE, M. D.
dc.contributor.authorROUTHIER, F.
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-09T15:53:19Z
dc.date.available2021-02-09T15:53:19Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1929-0748 (Print)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/26209
dc.description.abstractEnBackground: Power mobility devices (PMD) are critical to achieving independent mobility and social participation for many individuals who have trouble walking. Provision of PMDs is complex, with cognitive functioning expressed by clinicians as a major concern. Even if PMD use can be predicted by the level of cognitive functioning, outcome tools used to assess readiness do not consider how cognitive functioning may affect PMD use. Objective: The specific aims of this review are to identify existing assessments used to assess cognitive functioning and PMD use, classify cognitive functions that are identified within existing assessments related to PMD use, and explore the relationships between cognitive functioning (ie, executive functions and attention) and PMD use. Methods: A systematic review will be conducted using the electronic databases MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO (Ovid), and Web of Science based on the concepts of PMD performance and capacity, and cognitive functioning. To be included, studies must have: a sample of PMD users (inclusive of age and diagnoses), an assessment of cognitive functioning, and an assessment of PMD capacity or performance. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health will be used to classify cognitive functions. Study quality will be assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Qualitative and quantitative studies will be analyzed in a complementary manner depending on their designs; a result-based convergent synthesis design will be applied. Results: This proposed systematic review protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019118957). It was funded by the Quebec Rehabilitation Research Network and approved on February 2019. Conclusions: Results will inform the development of a PMD driving program that aims to enhance cognition. The results of this study will enhance understanding of the influence of cognitive functioning on PMD use and will support the clinical practice in choosing appropriate evaluative tools.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.subjectHACS
dc.title.enInfluence of Cognitive Functioning on Powered Mobility Device Use: Protocol for a Systematic Review
dc.title.alternativeJMIR Res Protocen_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2196/16534en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed32209537en_US
bordeaux.journalJMIR Research Protocolsen_US
bordeaux.pagee16534en_US
bordeaux.volume9en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - U1219en_US
bordeaux.issue3en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.teamHACSen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-03136414
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2021-02-09T15:53:23Z
hal.exporttrue
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=JMIR%20Research%20Protocols&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e16534&rft.epage=e16534&rft.eissn=1929-0748%20(Print)&rft.issn=1929-0748%20(Print)&rft.au=PELLICHERO,%20A.&KENYON,%20L.%20K.&BEST,%20K.%20L.&SORITA,%20Eric&LAMONTAGNE,%20M.%20E.&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée