Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorWUSTEN, C.
dc.contributor.authorSCHLIER, B.
dc.contributor.authorJAYA, E. S.
dc.contributor.authorGENETIC, Risk
dc.contributor.authorFONSECA-PEDRERO, E.
dc.contributor.authorPETERS, E.
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorVERDOUX, Helene
IDREF: 115951903
dc.contributor.authorWOODWARD, T. S.
dc.contributor.authorZIERMANS, T. B.
dc.contributor.authorLINCOLN, T. M.
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-07T09:57:07Z
dc.date.available2021-01-07T09:57:07Z
dc.date.issued2018-10-17
dc.identifier.issn1745-1701 (Electronic) 0586-7614 (Linking)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/23728
dc.description.abstractEnPsychotic experiences (PEs) are common in the general population but do not necessarily reflect a risk status if they occur in relative isolation or are not distressing. Emerging evidence suggests that PEs might be experienced as more benign for individuals from collectivistic low- and middle-income countries (LAMIC) compared with individualistic high-income countries (HIC). The aim of this study was to determine whether: (1) self-reported PEs are less distressing in community samples from LAMIC than from HIC; (2) the network of PEs is significantly less connected in a sample from LAMIC than from HIC. Adults from 8 HIC (n = 4669) and 5 LAMIC (n = 2472) were compared. The lifetime frequency of PEs and related distress were assessed with the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences. We analyzed the associations of PEs with distress and country type. The interconnection of PEs was visualized by a network analysis and tested for differences in global connection strengths. The average endorsement rates of PEs were significantly higher in LAMIC than in HIC (chi2 = 1772.87, P < .01, Phicramer = 0.50). There was a universal positive correlation between higher frequency of PEs and more distress, but the distress levels controlled for frequency were significantly higher in HIC (R2 = 0.11; b = 0.26; SE = 0.01; T = 17.68; P < .001). Moreover, the network of PEs was significantly less connected in LAMIC (S = 0.40, P < .05). The findings indicate that PEs are of less clinical relevance in LAMIC compared with HIC. The universal use of current high-risk criteria might thus not be adequate without consideration of associated distress and cultural values.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.subject.enPharmacoEpi-Drugs
dc.title.enPsychotic Experiences and Related Distress: A Cross-national Comparison and Network Analysis Based on 7141 Participants From 13 Countries
dc.title.alternativeSchizophr Bullen_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/schbul/sby087en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed29982814en_US
bordeaux.journalSchizophrenia Bulletinen_US
bordeaux.page1185-1194en_US
bordeaux.volume44en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219en_US
bordeaux.issue6en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.teamPharmacoEpi-Drugsen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-03193179
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2021-04-08T13:48:51Z
hal.exporttrue
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&amp;rft.jtitle=Schizophrenia%20Bulletin&amp;rft.date=2018-10-17&amp;rft.volume=44&amp;rft.issue=6&amp;rft.spage=1185-1194&amp;rft.epage=1185-1194&amp;rft.eissn=1745-1701%20(Electronic)%200586-7614%20(Linking)&amp;rft.issn=1745-1701%20(Electronic)%200586-7614%20(Linking)&amp;rft.au=WUSTEN,%20C.&amp;SCHLIER,%20B.&amp;JAYA,%20E.%20S.&amp;GENETIC,%20Risk&amp;FONSECA-PEDRERO,%20E.&amp;rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée