Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorROUSSELOT, N.
dc.contributor.authorTOMBREY, T.
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorZONGO, Drissa
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorMOUILLET, Evelyne
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorJOSEPH, Jean-Philippe
dc.contributor.authorGAY, B.
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorSALMI, Louis Rachid
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-04T11:06:12Z
dc.date.available2021-01-04T11:06:12Z
dc.date.issued2018-11-09
dc.identifier.issn1472-6920 (Electronic) 1472-6920 (Linking)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/23614
dc.description.abstractEnBACKGROUND: There is currently an absence of valid and relevant instruments to evaluate how Evidence-based Practice (EBP) training improves, beyond knowledge, physicians' skills. Our aim was to develop and test a tool to assess physicians' EBP skills. METHODS: The tool we developed includes four parts to assess the necessary skills for applying EBP steps: clinical question formulation; literature search; critical appraisal of literature; synthesis and decision making. We evaluated content and face validity, then tested applicability of the tool and whether external observers could reliably use it to assess acquired skills. We estimated Kappa coefficients to measure concordance between raters. RESULTS: Twelve general practice (GP) residents and eleven GP teachers from the University of Bordeaux, France, were asked to: formulate four clinical questions (diagnostic, prognosis, treatment, and aetiology) from a proposed clinical vignette, find articles or guidelines to answer four relevant provided questions, analyse an original article answering one of these questions, synthesize knowledge from provided synopses, and decide about the four clinical questions. Concordance between two external raters was excellent for their assessment of participants' appraisal of the significance of article results (K = 0.83), and good for assessment of the formulation of a diagnostic question (K = 0.76), PubMed/Medline (K = 0.71) or guideline (K = 0.67) search, and of appraisal of methodological validity of articles (K = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Our tool allows an in-depth analysis of EBP skills, thus could supplement existing instruments focused on knowledge or specific EBP step. The actual usefulness of such tools to improve care and population health remains to be evaluated.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subject.enIETO
dc.subject.enMORPH3Eus
dc.title.enDevelopment and pilot testing of a tool to assess evidence-based practice skills among French general practitioners
dc.title.alternativeBMC Med Educen_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12909-018-1368-yen_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed30413196en_US
bordeaux.journalBMC medical educationen_US
bordeaux.page254en_US
bordeaux.volume18en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - U1219en_US
bordeaux.issue1en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.teamIETOen_US
bordeaux.teamMORPH3Eusen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.exportfalse
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=BMC%20medical%20education&rft.date=2018-11-09&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=254&rft.epage=254&rft.eissn=1472-6920%20(Electronic)%201472-6920%20(Linking)&rft.issn=1472-6920%20(Electronic)%201472-6920%20(Linking)&rft.au=ROUSSELOT,%20N.&TOMBREY,%20T.&ZONGO,%20Drissa&MOUILLET,%20Evelyne&JOSEPH,%20Jean-Philippe&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée