Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Assessing Institutional Reputation Beyond Quality Rankings

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorHADDAD-ADAIMI, Marianne
dc.contributor.authorABI ZEID DAOU, Roy
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire de l'intégration, du matériau au système [IMS]
dc.contributor.authorDUCQ, Yves
ORCID: 0000-0001-5144-5876
IDREF: 119003791
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-29T07:33:52Z
dc.date.available2025-09-29T07:33:52Z
dc.date.issued2025-03-22
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/207674
dc.description.abstractEnThe recent massification and globalization of higher education coupled with the changing trends in global economy have seen a surge in benchmarking and ranking practices at the international level. Quality rankings rely on public information gathered mainly from reputational surveys, some input measures, and indicators of research performance. While all these rankings and related indicators have questionable validity as predictors of effective student learning, they have become highly influential on academic behavior, often encouraging institutions to invest time, resources, and effort in improving their rated reputation and image rather than actually improving their academic standards. At the same time, the quality ranking score significantly impacts reputational surveys; reputation is, therefore, both the outcome and the medium of rankings. Consequently, basing the reputation of a higher education institution on rankings and surveys bears several pitfalls as reputation holds many facets, and it would be simplistic to reduce it to one aspect. Nevertheless, universities have a lot to gain from a good reputation (and a good ranking as a matter of fact) and should, therefore, be able to assess it, monitor it, and even control it. The first purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that reputation is not limited to international rankings and surveys. The second one is to propose a list of indicators that higher education institutions can use to assess their own institutional reputation thoroughly, based on objective metrics. Measuring those “reputational indicators” would help identify areas of improvement and serve as a roadmap for institutions wishing to work on building their reputation, monitoring it, and enhancing it.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.subject.enReputation
dc.subject.enHigher Education Institutions
dc.subject.enUniversities
dc.subject.enAuto-Evaluation
dc.subject.enQuality rankings
dc.subject.enIndicators
dc.subject.enPerformance
dc.subject.enMedia visibility
dc.subject.enSocial engagement
dc.subject.enUniversity Social Responsibility
dc.title.enAssessing Institutional Reputation Beyond Quality Rankings
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1057/s41299-025-00219-4en_US
dc.subject.halSciences de l'ingénieur [physics]en_US
bordeaux.journalCorporate Reputation Reviewen_US
bordeaux.page175-197en_US
bordeaux.volume28en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesIMS : Laboratoire de l'Intégration du Matériau au Système - UMR 5218en_US
bordeaux.issue2en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionBordeaux INPen_US
bordeaux.institutionCNRSen_US
bordeaux.teamPRODUCTION ENGINEERING - MEIen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.import.sourcecrossref
hal.identifierhal-05287982
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2025-09-29T07:33:54Z
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exporttrue
workflow.import.sourcecrossref
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Corporate%20Reputation%20Review&rft.date=2025-03-22&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=175-197&rft.epage=175-197&rft.au=HADDAD-ADAIMI,%20Marianne&ABI%20ZEID%20DAOU,%20Roy&DUCQ,%20Yves&rft.genre=article


Archivos en el ítem

ArchivosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay archivos asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem