Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorLALLES, Ariane P.
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorMOUCHEBOEUF, Geoffroy
hal.structure.identifierInstitut de Neurosciences cognitives et intégratives d'Aquitaine [INCIA]
dc.contributor.authorDOAT, Emilie
dc.contributor.authorPILLET, Helene
dc.contributor.authorBONNET, Xavier
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-14T08:39:04Z
dc.date.available2025-04-14T08:39:04Z
dc.date.issued2025-11-22
dc.identifier.issn1959-0318en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/206157
dc.description.abstractEnBackground: Stroke is the most common cause of disabilities worldwide. Rehabilitation is central to restore functions. Inertial measurement units (IMU) can be used to ease goal settings and monitor progression. Contrary to optical motion capture (OMC), IMU are less expensive, portable, and allow large scale data collections in ambulatory settings. Although Xsens MVN system validity has been demonstrated in healthy participants, its validity among post-stroke (PS) patients is yet to be proven. Research question: Computation methods being affected by the calibration type; the goal of this study is to compare lower limbs kinematics from Xsens system, after two calibrations against OMC in slow PS walkers exhibiting reduced ranges of movements. Methods: Data was collected for six PS patients. They were equipped with 29 reflective markers and seven IMU. A minimum of two walks with a dynamic calibration and four walks with a static calibration were performed. All trials were accomplished at a self-selected walking speed and PS used their usual walking aids. Results: Few interactions between the calibration type and side were found for the ankle abduction/adduction (A/A) bias, root mean square error (RMSE), and range of motion difference (ROMd) (p = 0.011, p = 0.048, p = 0.039). Few effects of the side on errors' values were found. We noticed some effects of the calibration type on errors' values, the dynamic calibration showing better results. In the sagittal plane, we reported RMSE values from 3.6 to 4.8°, 5.2 to 6.5°, and 5.0 to 5.9° for the hip, knee, and ankle dynamic calibration. Significance: The calibration type, reduced range of movement, and slow walking speed does not seem to impact Xsens' accuracy to a great extent. Nevertheless, dynamic calibration provides slightly better results. Considering the patient's walking ability, we recommend using this calibration. © 2024 AGBM
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.title.enIMU Calibration Effect on Lower Limbs Kinematics Against Optical Motion Capture in Post-Stroke Gait
dc.title.alternativeIRBMen_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.irbm.2024.100873en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
bordeaux.journalInnovation and Research in BioMedical engineeringen_US
bordeaux.page100873en_US
bordeaux.volume46en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219en_US
bordeaux.issue1en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionINSERMen_US
bordeaux.institutionCNRS
bordeaux.teamACTIVE_BPHen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-05032919
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2025-04-14T08:39:06Z
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exporttrue
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Innovation%20and%20Research%20in%20BioMedical%20engineering&rft.date=2025-11-22&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=100873&rft.epage=100873&rft.eissn=1959-0318&rft.issn=1959-0318&rft.au=LALLES,%20Ariane%20P.&MOUCHEBOEUF,%20Geoffroy&DOAT,%20Emilie&PILLET,%20Helene&BONNET,%20Xavier&rft.genre=article


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record