Show simple item record

hal.structure.identifierUniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu = Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań [UAM]
dc.contributor.authorFOEST, Jessie
hal.structure.identifierUniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu = Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań [UAM]
dc.contributor.authorBOGDZIEWICZ, Michal
hal.structure.identifierBiodiversité, Gènes & Communautés [BioGeCo]
dc.contributor.authorCAIGNARD, Thomas
hal.structure.identifierUniversidad Nacional de San Juan [Argentine] [UNSJ]
dc.contributor.authorHADAD, Martin
hal.structure.identifierKeele University [Keele]
dc.contributor.authorTHOMAS, Peter
hal.structure.identifierUniversity of Liverpool
dc.contributor.authorHACKET-PAIN, Andrew
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-21T03:01:56Z
dc.date.available2025-03-21T03:01:56Z
dc.date.issued2025-04
dc.identifier.issn0378-1127
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/205593
dc.description.abstractEnMasting, i.e. interannually variable and synchronized seed production, plays a crucial role in forest ecosystems, influencing wildlife dynamics, pathogen prevalence, and forest regeneration. Accurately capturing masting variability is important for effective forest management, conservation efforts, and predicting ecosystem responses to environmental changes. The adoption of low-cost methods facilitates the large-scale data acquisition needed in this time of unprecedented environmental upheaval, but it is important to understand the reliability of such methods. We investigated the relationship between the timed count method and the quadrat-based method for monitoring seed production in European beech (Fagus sylvatica). The timed count method is fast, costeffective, and suitable for areas with public access. These characteristics make time counts a practical choice for large-scale seed monitoring. However, the method has not been cross-calibrated with more traditional ground-based methods like quadrat sampling, which involves exhaustive seed collection from designated plots under tree canopies. Our research reveals a loglinear relationship between seed counts obtained by the two methods, and shows that the timed count is an effective method of estimating seed production. We also found that seed production exhibits greater dispersion in patchiness at lower levels of seed fall, which explains why the timed count method, covering a larger area, captures greater variability in seed fall compared to the quadrat method in such contexts. This highlights the importance of choosing an appropriate sampling strategy to accurately assess seed fall. The differences between the two methods introduce variability into derived masting metrics, such as the coefficient of variation and synchrony, with individual-level seed production variability metrics being more affected than population-level ones. The findings underscore the importance of understanding how different sampling methods can impact long-term ecological studies, particularly those focused on masting behaviour.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subject.enMast seeding
dc.subject.enTimed count
dc.subject.enSeed production
dc.subject.enFagus sylvatica
dc.subject.enQuadrat count
dc.subject.enGround plot
dc.title.enComparing two ground-based seed count methods and their effect on masting metrics
dc.typeArticle de revue
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122551
dc.subject.halSciences de l'environnement
bordeaux.journalForest Ecology and Management
bordeaux.page122551
bordeaux.volume581
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBioGeCo (Biodiversité Gènes & Communautés) - UMR 1202*
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeaux
bordeaux.institutionINRAE
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierhal-04998154
hal.version1
hal.popularnon
hal.audienceInternationale
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//hal-04998154v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Forest%20Ecology%20and%20Management&rft.date=2025-04&rft.volume=581&rft.spage=122551&rft.epage=122551&rft.eissn=0378-1127&rft.issn=0378-1127&rft.au=FOEST,%20Jessie&BOGDZIEWICZ,%20Michal&CAIGNARD,%20Thomas&HADAD,%20Martin&THOMAS,%20Peter&rft.genre=article


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record