Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorDEMIERRE, Cyrielle
dc.contributor.authorPYTHON, Grégoire
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorGLIZE, Bertrand
ORCID: 0000-0001-9618-2088
IDREF: 178853267
dc.contributor.authorLAGANARO, Marina
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-13T09:18:38Z
dc.date.available2025-02-13T09:18:38Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn0268-7038en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/204836
dc.description.abstractEnBackground: Utterance production is affected under dual-task conditions, but so far studies have shown an impact either on lexical or on phonological processes, but not on both simultaneously. Aims: In the present study, we aimed at investigating how interference on lexical and phonological encoding is modulated by the timing of the concurrent task and by the attentional requirement (divided vs focused attention). Methods: Participants with aphasia (PWA) underwent a picture naming task and an auditory detection task, with auditory stimuli presented at different stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs). The dual-task was performed under divided (Experiment 1) and focused attention (Experiment 2). Outcome & Results: Omission errors increased under dual-task at early SOA only in Experiment 1 while phonological errors increased at later SOAs in both experiments. Conclusion: These patterns of errors indicate that lexical and phonological processes are impacted under dual-task conditions, giving rise to an increase of specific types of errors at specific SOAs. They also show that very mild anomia may be more severe when assessed under dual-task conditions. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subject.enDual-Task
dc.subject.enWord Production
dc.subject.enInterference
dc.subject.enAttention
dc.subject.enAphasia
dc.title.enHow dual-task interference on word production is modulated by the timing of the secondary task: evidence from errors in people with aphasia
dc.title.alternativeAphasiologyen_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02687038.2023.2253567en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
bordeaux.journalAphasiologyen_US
bordeaux.page1028-1050en_US
bordeaux.volume38en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219en_US
bordeaux.issue6en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionINSERMen_US
bordeaux.teamACTIVE_BPHen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-04945043
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2025-02-13T09:18:42Z
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exporttrue
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Aphasiology&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1028-1050&rft.epage=1028-1050&rft.eissn=0268-7038&rft.issn=0268-7038&rft.au=DEMIERRE,%20Cyrielle&PYTHON,%20Gr%C3%A9goire&GLIZE,%20Bertrand&LAGANARO,%20Marina&rft.genre=article


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record