Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorBILLETTE DE VILLEMEUR, Agathe
dc.contributor.authorHOEN, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorBILLAUD, Eric
dc.contributor.authorDERUELLE, Philippe
dc.contributor.authorGOUESLARD, Karine
dc.contributor.authorHALLEY DES FONTAINES, Virginie
dc.contributor.authorMINODIER, Philippe
dc.contributor.authorPARENT, Bertrand
dc.contributor.authorPOZZETTO, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorREVEST, Matthieu
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorSALMI, Louis Rachid
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-22T14:30:43Z
dc.date.available2025-01-22T14:30:43Z
dc.date.issued2024-12-01
dc.identifier.issn2589-5370en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/204478
dc.description.abstractEnThe benefits of screening for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection during pregnancy remain a topic of debate. To date, no randomized trial has compared the impact of screening versus routine management on the prevention of severe sequelae in newborns. Furthermore, it is unclear what actions can be taken in case of a positive screening given that there is limited evidence of effective interventions as no treatments showed significant effect on the frequency of congenital cytomegalovirus infections and, as additional challenge, the window for effective treatment initiation after maternal infection is narrow, estimated to be as short as five weeks. Universal screening of all pregnant women could lead to a high number of false positives. There are also concerns regarding the cost-effectiveness of universal screening and the capacity of healthcare professionals that may struggle to manage the increased workload, and we argue that the conditions for implementing such a programme are not yet met. In this Viewpoint we aim at highlighting these challenges and stimulating the forthcoming discussion on how to fill the gaps before CMV screening in pregnancy could be adopted as a standard practice.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/*
dc.subject.enCongenital cytomegalovirus infection
dc.subject.enCytomegalovirus infections
dc.subject.enSystematic screening
dc.subject.enValacyclovir
dc.title.enCurrent evidence gaps to support systematic cytomegalovirus screening in pregnancy.
dc.title.alternativeEClinicalMedicineen_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102941en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed39640941en_US
bordeaux.journalEClinicalMedicineen_US
bordeaux.page102941en_US
bordeaux.volume78en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionINSERMen_US
bordeaux.teamAHEAD_BPHen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.import.sourcepubmed
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exportfalse
workflow.import.sourcepubmed
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=EClinicalMedicine&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=78&rft.spage=102941&rft.epage=102941&rft.eissn=2589-5370&rft.issn=2589-5370&rft.au=BILLETTE%20DE%20VILLEMEUR,%20Agathe&HOEN,%20Bruno&BILLAUD,%20Eric&DERUELLE,%20Philippe&GOUESLARD,%20Karine&rft.genre=article


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record