Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierESTIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
dc.contributor.authorMAHUT, Stephanie
dc.contributor.authorEYNARD, Benoît
hal.structure.identifierESTIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire de l'intégration, du matériau au système [IMS]
dc.contributor.authorMERLO, Christophe
ORCID: 0000-0002-7010-306X
IDREF: 79158552
hal.structure.identifierESTIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
dc.contributor.authorMINEL, Stephanie
dc.contributor.authorBEAUJON, T.
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-20T10:00:52Z
dc.date.available2024-12-20T10:00:52Z
dc.date.issued2012-07-04
dc.date.conference2012-07-02
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/204045
dc.description.abstractEnCompanies can use methodological software tools to perform requirement engineering. Those methodological tools are increasingly developped by external software editors and integrators. The performance of the tools is not enough to ensure efficiency of methodology application. This paper is part of a PhD research program. This research program focuses on the way of integrating requirement engineering tools into product design department with a provider perspective. To be more precise, this research project emphasizes on modifications occuring during integration phases. In order to evaluate and improve integration process, key indicators can be proposed. From the first stage of integration to the moment user is autonomous, key integration factors often change. For example, requirements of the user, user environment, product life cycle, delay integration, actors, ... This paper aims at proposing surveys to identify those changing key factors. Then, first best practices elements are given to counteract the possible negative impact on efficiency of requirement engineering tools integration and thus, on product development. In fact, this paper goes further into the way to analyze existing system. It notably deals with first elements from industrial survey on IT vendor and their customer perspectives on tools integration. In addition, preliminary survey results on customer dissatisfaction are proposed and analyzed. It also proposes a short case study and further research work in order to assume those first results and to bring to the definition of integration approach for methodological tools in engineering domain.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.title.enBest practices assessment in requirements engineering tools integration
dc.typeCommunication dans un congrèsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/ESDA2012-82860en_US
dc.subject.halSciences de l'ingénieur [physics]/Autreen_US
bordeaux.pagepp. 473-482, ISBN: 978-0-7918-4486-1en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesESTIA - Rechercheen_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.conference.titleASME 2012 11th Biennial Conference On Engineering Systems Design And Analysis ESDA 2012en_US
bordeaux.countryfren_US
bordeaux.title.proceedingASME 2012 11th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis Volume 3: Advanced Composite Materials and Processing; Robotics; Information Management and PLM; Design Engineeringen_US
bordeaux.conference.cityNantesen_US
bordeaux.import.sourcehal
hal.identifierhal-00772586
hal.version1
hal.invitednonen_US
hal.proceedingsouien_US
hal.conference.end2012-07-04
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exportfalse
workflow.import.sourcehal
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.date=2012-07-04&rft.spage=pp.%20473-482,%20ISBN:%20978-0-7918-4486-1&rft.epage=pp.%20473-482,%20ISBN:%20978-0-7918-4486-1&rft.au=MAHUT,%20Stephanie&EYNARD,%20Beno%C3%AEt&MERLO,%20Christophe&MINEL,%20Stephanie&BEAUJON,%20T.&rft.genre=unknown


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record