Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorSEGAIN, Alexandre
hal.structure.identifierInstitut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie [I2M]
dc.contributor.authorSCIUME, Giuseppe
IDREF: 170950476
dc.contributor.authorPILLET, Helene
dc.contributor.authorROHAN, Pierre-Yves
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-11T07:55:17Z
dc.date.available2024-07-11T07:55:17Z
dc.date.issued2024-08-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/200839
dc.description.abstractEnBiomechanical parameters have the potential to be used as physical markers for prevention and diagnosis. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) is a widely used tool to evaluate these parameters in vivo. However, the development of clinically relevant FEA requires personalisation of the geometry, boundary conditions, and constitutive parameters. This contribution focuses on the characterisation of mechanical properties in vivo which remains a significant challenge for the community. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the sensitivity of the computed elastic parameters (shear modulus of fat and muscle tissues) derived by inverse analysis as a function of the geometrical modelling assumption (homogenised monolayer vs bilayer) and the formulation of the cost function. The methodology presented here proposes to extract the experimental force-displacement response for each tissue layer (muscle and fat) and construct the associated Finite Element Model for each volunteer, based on data previously collected in our group (N = 7 volunteers) as reported in (Fougeron et al., 2020). The sensitivity analysis indicates that the choice of the cost function has minimal impact on the topology of the response surface in the parametric space. Each surface displays a valley of parameters that minimises the cost function. The constitutive properties of the thigh (reported as median ± interquartile range) were determined to be (μ=198±322Pa,α=37) for the monolayer and (μmuscle=1675±1127Pa,αmuscle=22±14,μfat=537±1131Pa,αfat=32±7) for the bilayer. A comparison of the homogenised monolayer and bilayer models showed that adding a layer reduces the error on the local force displacement curves, increasing the accuracy of the local kinematics of soft tissues during indentation. This allows for an increased understanding of load transmission in soft tissue. The comparison of the two models in terms of strains indicates that the modelling choice significantly influences the localization of maximal compressive strains. These results support the idea that the biomechanical community should conduct further work to develop reliable methodologies for estimating in vivo strain in soft tissue.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.subject.enMechanical characterisation in vivo
dc.subject.enPressure ulcer prevention
dc.subject.enUltrasound/Echography
dc.title.enIn vivo mechanical response of thigh soft tissues under compression: A two-layer model allows an improved representation of the local tissue kinematics
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106584en_US
dc.subject.halSciences de l'ingénieur [physics]/Matériauxen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed38810544en_US
bordeaux.journalJournal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materialsen_US
bordeaux.volume156en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesInstitut de Mécanique et d’Ingénierie de Bordeaux (I2M) - UMR 5295en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionBordeaux INPen_US
bordeaux.institutionCNRSen_US
bordeaux.institutionINRAEen_US
bordeaux.institutionArts et Métiersen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.description.error<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <sword:error xmlns:sword="http://purl.org/net/sword/error/" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" href="http://purl.org/net/sword/error/ErrorBadRequest"> <title>ERROR</title> <updated>2024-07-12T09:38:16+02:00</updated> <author> <name>HAL SWORD API Server</name> </author> <source> <generator uri="https://api.archives-ouvertes.fr/sword" version="1.0">hal@ccsd.cnrs.fr</generator> </source> <summary>Some parameters sent with the request were not understood</summary> <sword:treatment>processing failed</sword:treatment> <sword:verboseDescription>{"related":{"identifier":{"regexNotMatch":"'https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmbbm.2024.106584' n'est pas un DOI valide, par exemple : 10.xxx"}}}</sword:verboseDescription> <link rel="alternate" href="https://api.archives-ouvertes.fr" type="text/html"/> </sword:error>
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exporttrue
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&amp;rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Mechanical%20Behavior%20of%20Biomedical%20Materials&amp;rft.date=2024-08-01&amp;rft.volume=156&amp;rft.au=SEGAIN,%20Alexandre&amp;SCIUME,%20Giuseppe&amp;PILLET,%20Helene&amp;ROHAN,%20Pierre-Yves&amp;rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée