Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorMAILHO, Camille
dc.contributor.authorPEYRONNET, Benoit
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorDE SEZE, Marianne
dc.contributor.authorEVEN, Alexia
dc.contributor.authorPERROUIN-VERBE, Maire-Aimee
dc.contributor.authorAMARENCO, Gerard
dc.contributor.authorCHARTIER-KASTLER, Emmanuel
dc.contributor.authorLE NORMAND, Loic
dc.contributor.authorMANUNTA, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorKARSENTY, Gilles
dc.contributor.authorKERDRAON, Jacques
dc.contributor.authorRUFFION, Alain
dc.contributor.authorSAUSSINE, Christian
dc.contributor.authorLE BRETON, Frederique
dc.contributor.authorBERNUZ, Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorCASTEL-LACANAL, Evelyne
dc.contributor.authorDENYS, Pierre
dc.contributor.authorPHE, Veronique
dc.contributor.authorGAME, Xavier
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-21T09:32:35Z
dc.date.available2024-06-21T09:32:35Z
dc.date.issued2024-04-01
dc.identifier.issn1520-6777en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/200606
dc.description.abstractEnINTRODUCTION: Neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) has a major impact on patients' quality of life and can lead to upper urinary tract complications. Intradetrusor botulinum toxin type A injections are administered as second-line treatment to these patients following the failure of anticholinergic agents. The aim of the DETOX 2 study is to propose a consensus definition of the failure of intradetrusor botulinum toxin injections for NDO in patients presenting spinal cord injury, spina bifida, or multiple sclerosis (MS) with self-catheterization. METHOD: This study followed the method adopted by the French National Authority for Health for recommendations by consensus. Based on a review of the literature and a preliminary survey, a steering committee compiled a questionnaire and selected a rating group comprising 16 experts from the Neuro-Urology Committee of the French Urology Association (cnuAFU) and Genulf. The experts were asked to complete the online questionnaire. At the end of the first round, all participants came together to discuss any disagreements and a second-round online questionnaire was completed to reach a consensus. RESULTS: Thirteen of the 16 experts approached completed both rounds of questionnaires. A strong consensus was reached for two proposals (median score = 9/10) which were therefore included in the definition from the first round: at least one repeat injection of the same botulinum toxin at the same dose must be given to rule out failure on technical grounds and a duration of efficacy <3 months must be considered a failure. At the end of round 2, a relative consensus was reached regarding the clinical criterion defining failure (median score = 7/10) and the urodynamic criterion of failure (median score = 8/10). An additional proposal was selected during this second round on the need for a voiding diary (median score = 8/10). CONCLUSION: The first consensus definition of failure of an intradetrusor injection of TB-A for NDO has been achieved with this study: persistence of detrusor overactivity with maximum detrusor pressures >40 cm H(2)O and/or a compliance issue and/or persistence of urinary incontinence and/or urgency and/or a number of daily self-catheterizations >8/day and/or efficacy <3 months. This study will help to standardize research on the failure of the intradetrusor botulinum toxin for NDO in clinical practice and clinical research.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subject.enBotulinum Toxin
dc.subject.enFailure
dc.subject.enIntradetrusor Injections Of Botulinum Toxin
dc.subject.enNeurological Detrusor Overactivity
dc.title.enHow to define failure of intradetrusor injections of botulinum toxin A for neurogenic detrusor overactivity
dc.title.alternativeNeurourol Urodynen_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/nau.25427en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed38451038en_US
bordeaux.journalNeurourology and Urodynamicsen_US
bordeaux.page811-817en_US
bordeaux.volume43en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219en_US
bordeaux.issue4en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionINSERMen_US
bordeaux.teamACTIVE_BPHen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-04619999
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2024-06-21T09:32:38Z
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exporttrue
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&amp;rft.jtitle=Neurourology%20and%20Urodynamics&amp;rft.date=2024-04-01&amp;rft.volume=43&amp;rft.issue=4&amp;rft.spage=811-817&amp;rft.epage=811-817&amp;rft.eissn=1520-6777&amp;rft.issn=1520-6777&amp;rft.au=MAILHO,%20Camille&amp;PEYRONNET,%20Benoit&amp;DE%20SEZE,%20Marianne&amp;EVEN,%20Alexia&amp;PERROUIN-VERBE,%20Maire-Aimee&amp;rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée