Afficher la notice abrégée

ReScience

hal.structure.identifierSynchrotron SOLEIL [SSOLEIL]
dc.contributor.authorHINSEN, Konrad
hal.structure.identifierInstitut des Maladies Neurodégénératives [Bordeaux] [IMN]
dc.contributor.authorROUGIER, Nicolas
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-15T09:57:06Z
dc.date.available2024-04-15T09:57:06Z
dc.date.issued2015-12-03
dc.date.conference2015-12-03
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/198887
dc.description.abstractEnIf computer science offers a large set of tools for prototyping, writing, running, testing, validating, sharing and reproducing results, computational science still lags behind. In the best case, authors may provide the sources of their research as a compressed archive and feel confident their research is reproducible. But this is not exactly true. Buckheit & Donoho (1995) explained almost 20 years ago that, an article about computational result is advertising, not scholarship. The actual scholarship is the full software environment, code and data that produced the result. The computational part in computational sciences implies the use of computers, operating systems, tools, frameworks, libraries and data. This leads to such a large number of combinations (taking into account the version for each components) that the chances to have the exact same configuration as one of your colleague are nearly zero. This draws consequences in our respective computational approaches in order to make sure research can be actually and faithfully reproduced.ReScience is a peer-reviewed journal that target computational research and encourage the explicit reproduction of already published research promoting new and open-source implementations in order to ensure the original research is reproducible. To achieve such a goal, the whole editing chain is radically different from any other traditional scientific journal. ReScience lives on github where each new implementation is made available together with the comments, explanations and tests. Each submission takes the form of a pull request that is publicly reviewed and tested in order to guarantee any researcher can re-use it. If you ever reproduced computational result from the literature in your research, ReScience is the perfect place to publish this new implementation.
dc.language.isoen
dc.title.enReScience
dc.title.enReproducible Science is good. Replicated Science is better.
dc.typeCommunication dans un congrès
dc.subject.halSciences cognitives/Neurosciences
dc.subject.halInformatique [cs]
dc.subject.halPhysique [physics]
dc.subject.halSciences de l'environnement
dc.subject.halPlanète et Univers [physics]
dc.subject.halChimie
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesLaboratoire Bordelais de Recherche en Informatique (LaBRI) - UMR 5800*
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeaux
bordeaux.institutionBordeaux INP
bordeaux.institutionCNRS
bordeaux.conference.titleRetour d’expéRiences sur la Recherche Reproductible
bordeaux.countryFR
bordeaux.conference.cityOrléans
bordeaux.peerReviewednon
hal.identifierhal-01237835
hal.version1
hal.invitedoui
hal.proceedingsnon
hal.conference.organizerKonrad HINSEN, Andrew DAVISON, Christophe POUZAT
hal.conference.end2015-12-04
hal.popularnon
hal.audienceNationale
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//hal-01237835v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.date=2015-12-03&rft.au=HINSEN,%20Konrad&ROUGIER,%20Nicolas&rft.genre=unknown


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée