Show simple item record

hal.structure.identifierSanté et agroécologie du vignoble [UMR SAVE]
dc.contributor.authorLI, Shuxian
hal.structure.identifierAvignon Université [AU]
dc.contributor.authorBONNEU, Florent
hal.structure.identifierGénétique et Amélioration des Fruits et Légumes [GAFL]
dc.contributor.authorCHADOEUF, Joel
hal.structure.identifierInteractions Sol Plante Atmosphère [UMR ISPA]
dc.contributor.authorDESHORS-PICART, Delphine
hal.structure.identifierInstitut Élie Cartan de Lorraine [IECL]
hal.structure.identifierBiology, genetics and statistics [BIGS]
dc.contributor.authorGÉGOUT PETIT, Anne
hal.structure.identifierSanté et agroécologie du vignoble [UMR SAVE]
dc.contributor.authorGUÉRIN-DUBRANA, Lucia
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-08T12:06:20Z
dc.date.available2024-04-08T12:06:20Z
dc.date.created2015
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn0031-949X
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/196398
dc.description.abstractEnTo assess the capacity of esca to spread within vineyards of the Bordeaux region, over 8 years of annual records, containing between 1,200 and 2,300 contiguous Cabernet Sauvignon vines from 15 mature vineyards, were used for spatial statistical analyses. A group of non-parametric tests, based on join count statistics and on permutation methods, was developed to characterize the spatial structure of esca-symptomatic vines in terms of spread in any direction or within-row only. Among vineyards, a large range of spatial patterns, from random to strongly structured, associated with various prevalence rates that increased over time, were observed. In four vineyards, the complex esca distribution pattern indicated different levels of clustering. By contrast, in other vineyards, only small clusters of two adjacent symptomatic vines were observed, and they were localized along rows, without enlargement over time, except in one vineyard. An analysis of spatial dependence between previously- and newly-symptomatic vines within k-order neighborhoods (k = 1 to 5), showed, for 5 of the 15 vineyards, that the newly-symptomatic vines were located close to previously-infected vines, without a favored orientation or neighbor order. All the results together suggested a limited potential for secondary local spread from neighboring symptomatic vine.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmerican Phytopathological Society
dc.subject.enfungal disease
dc.subject.enjoin count statistics
dc.title.enSpatial and temporal pattern analyses of Esca grapevine disease in vineyards in France
dc.typeArticle de revue
dc.identifier.doi10.1094/PHYTO-07-15-0154-R
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Sciences agricoles
bordeaux.journalPhytopathology
bordeaux.page59-69
bordeaux.volume107
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesInteractions Soil Plant Atmosphere (ISPA) - UMR 1391*
bordeaux.issue1
bordeaux.institutionBordeaux Sciences Agro
bordeaux.institutionINRAE
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierhal-02620348
hal.version1
hal.popularnon
hal.audienceInternationale
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//hal-02620348v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Phytopathology&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=59-69&rft.epage=59-69&rft.eissn=0031-949X&rft.issn=0031-949X&rft.au=LI,%20Shuxian&BONNEU,%20Florent&CHADOEUF,%20Joel&DESHORS-PICART,%20Delphine&G%C3%89GOUT%20PETIT,%20Anne&rft.genre=article


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record