Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorBRACHERT, Thomas
hal.structure.identifierEnvironnements et Paléoenvironnements OCéaniques [EPOC]
dc.contributor.authorCORREGE, Thierry
dc.contributor.authorREUTER, Markus
dc.contributor.authorWROZYNA, Claudia
hal.structure.identifierEnvironnements et Paléoenvironnements OCéaniques [EPOC]
dc.contributor.authorLONDEIX, Laurent
dc.contributor.authorSPRETER, Philipp
hal.structure.identifierHistoire naturelle de l'Homme préhistorique [HNHP]
dc.contributor.authorPERRIN, Christine
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-22T17:07:25Z
dc.date.available2024-01-22T17:07:25Z
dc.date.issued2020-05
dc.identifier.issn0012-8252en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/187399
dc.description.abstractEnShallow-water reef-building corals have an extensive geological record and many aspects of their evolution, biodiversity, and biogeography are known in great details. In contrast, the adaptive potential and risk of extinction of coral reefs in response to excessive warming and ocean acidification remains largely undocumented. It is well established that anthropogenic CO2 emissions cause global warming and ocean acidification (lowering of pH), which increasingly impede the biomineralization process in many marine calcareous biota. The “light-enhanced” calcification machinery of the shallow-water reef corals is particularly threatened by this development through the combined effect of a lowering of the supersaturation of seawater with CaCO3 (aragonite) and an expulsion of the symbiotic zooxanthellae (bleaching). The bleaching is of prime importance, because it interrupts the supply of DIC and metabolites required for pH upregulation within the calcification fluid. The degree of calcification in scleractinian reef corals may therefore represent a suitable tracer to assess the state of the ocean carbonate system and the photosynthetic performance of the zooxanthellae during past episodes of natural environmental change. This study presents the first comprehensive set of calcification data from corals covering the early Miocene to early Pleistocene interval (20.8 to 1.2 million years, Ma). Various screening procedures ensured that the studied coral skeletons are pristine and suited to yield meaningful stable isotope data (δ¹⁸O, δ¹³C) and calcification records. δ¹⁸O and δ¹³C values document growth environments consistent with current tropical and subtropical settings. To assess fossil calcification rates, we use a reference dataset of recent corals from the Indo-Pacific (Porites) and an independent validation dataset from the Western Atlantic-Caribbean (Orbicella). Almost all fossil corals document very low annual rates of upward growth (“extension rate”) relative to present, and lower skeletal bulk density than predicted by established modern relationships. To allow for a quantitative assessment of coral calcification performance, we use a new approach that we term the calcification anomaly. It is insensitive to sea-surface temperature and well-suited for comparative assessments of calcification performance between reef sites and over time. Based on this approach, the majority of fossil corals in our dataset displays hypo-calcification, while a few show optimal calcification and none display hyper-calcification. Compared to present-day growth conditions, the fossil calcification data show that (1) skeletogenesis responded in a fully compatible way to known environmental stresses (e.g. turbid water, elevated salinity, eutrophy), and that (2) the calcification performance within the reef window (i.e. oligotrophic clear-water settings) remained below that of modern z-corals. Since fossil coral δ¹³C values are compatible with those of modern reef corals, we infer that the light-enhanced calcification system of symbiotic scleractinian corals was fully established by the beginning of the Neogene and that lower-than-present calcification performance was the likely response to a chronically low pH and/or low carbonate saturation state of the global ocean. If so, the present-day saturation state appears to be rather an exception than the norm and probably not a suitable starting point for predicting future calcification trends. In addition, using trends from the geological past does not include anthropogenic side-effects such as eutrophication and pollution.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
dc.subject.enReef coral
dc.subject.encalcification rate
dc.subject.enocean acidification
dc.subject.engeological past
dc.subject.enNeogene
dc.subject.enQuaternary
dc.title.enAn assessment of reef coral calcification over the late Cenozoic
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103154en_US
dc.subject.halPlanète et Univers [physics]/Sciences de la Terreen_US
dc.subject.halPlanète et Univers [physics]/Sciences de la Terre/Océanographieen_US
dc.subject.halPlanète et Univers [physics]/Sciences de la Terre/Paléontologieen_US
bordeaux.journalEarth-Science Reviewsen_US
bordeaux.page103154en_US
bordeaux.volume204en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesEPOC : Environnements et Paléoenvironnements Océaniques et Continentaux - UMR 5805en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionCNRSen_US
bordeaux.teamPALEOen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.import.sourcehal
hal.identifiermnhn-02667957
hal.version1
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exportfalse
workflow.import.sourcehal
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Earth-Science%20Reviews&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=204&rft.spage=103154&rft.epage=103154&rft.eissn=0012-8252&rft.issn=0012-8252&rft.au=BRACHERT,%20Thomas&CORREGE,%20Thierry&REUTER,%20Markus&WROZYNA,%20Claudia&LONDEIX,%20Laurent&rft.genre=article


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record