Afficher la notice abrégée

hal.structure.identifierUniversité libre de Bruxelles [ULB]
dc.contributor.authorPILET, Jean-Benoit
hal.structure.identifierCentre Émile Durkheim [CED]
dc.contributor.authorBEDOCK, Camille
hal.structure.identifierUniversité libre de Bruxelles [ULB]
dc.contributor.authorTALUKDER, David
hal.structure.identifierUniversité libre de Bruxelles [ULB]
hal.structure.identifierCentre d'étude de la vie politique [CEVIPOL]
dc.contributor.authorRANGONI, Sacha
dc.date.issued2024-04
dc.identifier.issn0007-1234
dc.description.abstractEnThe literature on deliberative mini-publics (DMPs) establishes a link between political dissatisfaction and support for DMPs. However, little is known about the sources of political dissatisfaction that trigger this greater support for mini-publics. Our research tackles this specific question and claims that citizens’ dissatisfaction is rooted in a position of ‘losers of representative democracy’, which, in turn, leads citizens to be more open to reforms that move away from the representative model. Building on the literature on loser’s consent, we focus on the effect of voting for a party not associated to government and of descriptive and substantive (under)-representation on support for deliberative mini-publics. We rely on a comparative survey conducted across 15 Western European countries. Supporters of opposition parties and those who are badly represented both descriptively and substantively are more supportive of deliberative mini-publics. These findings have important implications for our understanding of public appeal for deliberative democracy instruments.
dc.description.sponsorshipUNEQUALCITIZEN - ANR-21-CE41-0005
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP)
dc.subject.endeliberative mini-publics
dc.subject.endeliberative democracy
dc.subject.ensortition
dc.subject.enrepresentative democracy
dc.subject.enlosers
dc.title.enSupport for deliberative mini-publics among the losers of representative democracy
dc.typeArticle de revue
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0007123423000479
dc.subject.halSciences de l'Homme et Société/Science politique
bordeaux.journalBritish Journal of Political Science
bordeaux.page295-312
bordeaux.volume54
bordeaux.issue2
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierhal-04276737
hal.version1
hal.popularnon
hal.audienceInternationale
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//hal-04276737v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=British%20Journal%20of%20Political%20Science&rft.date=2024-04&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=295-312&rft.epage=295-312&rft.eissn=0007-1234&rft.issn=0007-1234&rft.au=PILET,%20Jean-Benoit&BEDOCK,%20Camille&TALUKDER,%20David&RANGONI,%20Sacha&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée