Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorFOUET, Marie P. A.
dc.contributor.authorSINGER, David
hal.structure.identifierEnvironnements et Paléoenvironnements OCéaniques [EPOC]
dc.contributor.authorCOYNEL, Alexandra
dc.contributor.authorHELIOT, Swann
dc.contributor.authorHOWA, Helene
dc.contributor.authorLALANDE, Julie
hal.structure.identifierEnvironnements et Paléoenvironnements OCéaniques [EPOC]
dc.contributor.authorMOURET, Aurelia
dc.contributor.authorSCHWEIZER, Magali
dc.contributor.authorTCHERKEZ, Guillaume
dc.contributor.authorJORISSEN, Frans J.
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-08T14:16:49Z
dc.date.available2023-11-08T14:16:49Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-18
dc.identifier.issn2073-4441en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/184688
dc.description.abstractEnThis study focuses on the foraminiferal distribution on intertidal mudflats of two contrasted estuaries (Auray and Vie) along the French Atlantic coast. In both estuaries, the foraminiferal communities are dominated by Haynesina germanica and the Ammonia tepida group. Stations located near the outlets show a high diversity and abundance of species of the genus Elphidium. Stations in the inner estuary show a higher proportion of agglutinated species (Ammotium salsum, Ammobaculites agglutinans). Multivariate statistical analysis suggests that the distance to the sea and the percentage of fine sediment (<63 µm) are the two main parameters explaining the foraminiferal distribution. Chemical analyses of the sediment show that the two studied estuaries are not affected by major anthropogenic pollution, so that the faunas should mainly reflect the natural controlling parameters. Three indices of environmental quality commonly used in coastal areas show counter-intuitive differences between stations, suggesting that these indices may be less reliable for use in intertidal estuarine mudflats. The newly developed Marine Influence Index (MII) integrates three major ecological factors: the position of the sampling point on the salinity gradient, the emergence time at low tide and the relative importance of fresh water discharge. In our dataset, MII shows significant correlations with the controlling environmental parameters (distance to the sea, percentage grains < 63 µm), as well as with the foraminiferal patterns (PCA axis 1, species richness, percentage of Elphidium spp. and Quinqueloculina spp.). These results suggest that the MII explains a substantial part of the faunal variability on estuarine intertidal mudflats, and can be used to detect deviations from the natural distribution patterns in response to anthropogenic pollution.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subject.enestuary
dc.subject.enbiomonitoring
dc.subject.enforaminifera
dc.subject.enenvironmental parameters
dc.title.enForaminiferal Distribution in Two Estuarine Intertidal Mudflats of the French Atlantic Coast: Testing the Marine Influence Index
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/w14040645en_US
dc.subject.halSciences de l'environnementen_US
bordeaux.journalWateren_US
bordeaux.volume14en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesEPOC : Environnements et Paléoenvironnements Océaniques et Continentaux - UMR 5805en_US
bordeaux.issue4en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionCNRSen_US
bordeaux.teamTGMen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exportfalse
dc.rights.ccCC BYen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&amp;rft.jtitle=Water&amp;rft.date=2022-02-18&amp;rft.volume=14&amp;rft.issue=4&amp;rft.eissn=2073-4441&amp;rft.issn=2073-4441&amp;rft.au=FOUET,%20Marie%20P.%20A.&amp;SINGER,%20David&amp;COYNEL,%20Alexandra&amp;HELIOT,%20Swann&amp;HOWA,%20Helene&amp;rft.genre=article


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record