Performance of four centralized statistical monitoring methods for early detection of an atypical center in a multicenter study.
| dc.rights.license | open | en_US |
| hal.structure.identifier | Bordeaux population health [BPH] | |
| dc.contributor.author | NIANGORAN, Serge | |
| hal.structure.identifier | Bordeaux population health [BPH] | |
| hal.structure.identifier | Global Health in the Global South [GHiGS] | |
| dc.contributor.author | JOURNOT, Valerie | |
| hal.structure.identifier | Bordeaux population health [BPH] | |
| hal.structure.identifier | Global Health in the Global South [GHiGS] | |
| dc.contributor.author | MARCY, Olivier | |
| hal.structure.identifier | Bordeaux population health [BPH] | |
| hal.structure.identifier | Global Health in the Global South [GHiGS] | |
| dc.contributor.author | ANGLARET, Xavier | |
| hal.structure.identifier | Bordeaux population health [BPH] | |
| dc.contributor.author | ALIOUM, Amadou | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-04T13:52:23Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-10-04T13:52:23Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023-08-01 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2451-8654 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/184321 | |
| dc.description.abstractEn | Ensuring the quality of data is essential for the credibility of a multicenter clinical trial. Centralized Statistical Monitoring (CSM) of data allows the detection of a center in which the distribution of a specific variable is atypical compared to other centers. The ideal CSM method should allow early detection of problem and therefore involve the fewest possible participants. We simulated clinical trials and compared the performance of four CSM methods (Student, Hatayama, Desmet, Distance) to detect whether the distribution of a quantitative variable was atypical in one center in relation to the others, with different numbers of participants and different mean deviation amplitudes. The Student and Hatayama methods had good sensitivity but poor specificity, which disqualifies them for practical use in CSM. The Desmet and Distance methods had very high specificity for detecting all the mean deviations tested (including small values) but low sensitivity with mean deviations less than 50%. Although the Student and Hatayama methods are more sensitive, their low specificity would lead to too many alerts being triggered, which would result in additional unnecessary control work to ensure data quality. The Desmet and Distance methods have low sensitivity when the deviation from the mean is low, suggesting that the CSM should be used alongside other conventional monitoring procedures rather than replacing them. However, they have excellent specificity, which suggests they can be applied routinely, since using them takes up no time at central level and does not cause any unnecessary workload in investigating centers. | |
| dc.language.iso | EN | en_US |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ | * |
| dc.subject.en | Centralized Statistical monitoring | |
| dc.subject.en | Data quality | |
| dc.subject.en | Multicenter clinical trial | |
| dc.subject.en | Sensitivity | |
| dc.subject.en | Specificity | |
| dc.title.en | Performance of four centralized statistical monitoring methods for early detection of an atypical center in a multicenter study. | |
| dc.title.alternative | Contemp Clin Trials Commun | en_US |
| dc.type | Article de revue | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101168 | en_US |
| dc.subject.hal | Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie | en_US |
| dc.identifier.pubmed | 37425338 | en_US |
| bordeaux.journal | Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications | en_US |
| bordeaux.page | 101168 | en_US |
| bordeaux.volume | 34 | en_US |
| bordeaux.hal.laboratories | Bordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219 | en_US |
| bordeaux.institution | Université de Bordeaux | en_US |
| bordeaux.institution | INSERM | en_US |
| bordeaux.team | GHIGS | en_US |
| bordeaux.team | BIOSTAT | en_US |
| bordeaux.peerReviewed | oui | en_US |
| bordeaux.inpress | non | en_US |
| bordeaux.identifier.funderID | Institut de Recherche pour le Développement | en_US |
| bordeaux.import.source | pubmed | |
| hal.identifier | hal-04228569 | |
| hal.version | 1 | |
| hal.date.transferred | 2023-10-04T13:52:26Z | |
| hal.popular | non | en_US |
| hal.audience | Internationale | en_US |
| hal.export | true | |
| workflow.import.source | pubmed | |
| dc.rights.cc | Pas de Licence CC | en_US |
| bordeaux.COinS | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Contemporary%20Clinical%20Trials%20Communications&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=34&rft.spage=101168&rft.epage=101168&rft.eissn=2451-8654&rft.issn=2451-8654&rft.au=NIANGORAN,%20Serge&JOURNOT,%20Valerie&MARCY,%20Olivier&ANGLARET,%20Xavier&ALIOUM,%20Amadou&rft.genre=article |
