Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorVUILLERMOZ, Cecile
dc.contributor.authorPRIETO, Nathalie
dc.contributor.authorPIRARD, Philippe
dc.contributor.authorBAUBET, Thierry
dc.contributor.authorSTENE, Lise Eilin
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorVANDENTORREN, Stephanie
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-20T10:30:24Z
dc.date.available2023-02-20T10:30:24Z
dc.date.issued2022-12
dc.identifier.issn1945-1938 (Electronic) 1049-023X (Linking)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/171994
dc.description.abstractEnINTRODUCTION: Following a terrorist attack, responses to a psychosocial disaster range from low-intensity initiatives to high-intensity treatment. Some studies described post-disaster psychosocial services and planning across Europe. However, little is known about the psychosocial support (PS) actually delivered after terrorist attacks. STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study assesses prevalence and the factors associated with not receiving short-term PS among terror-exposed people with probable mental health disorders following the January 2015 terrorist attacks in France. METHODS: This study used data from the first wave of a longitudinal survey conducted six months after the attacks. Prevalence and factors associated with not receiving PS were described in the immediate period (48 hours), the early post-immediate period (48 hours-one week), and the medium-term (over one week) using a robust Poisson regression for each of the three periods. RESULTS: Nearly one-half of the participants (N = 189) did not receive PS in any period (46.6% in the immediate period, 45.5% in the early post-immediate period, and 54.5% in the medium-term). In each period, not receiving PS was associated with not being very close to the attack sites. Not receiving PS in the immediate period was also associated with being a direct witness (DW) rather than being directly threatened (DT) and not having support in daily life; in the early post-immediate period, not receiving PS was associated with not having a peri-traumatic dissociation experience and being followed for a psychological problem before the attacks; and in the medium-term period, it was associated with perceived social isolation. CONCLUSION: The characteristics of the terror exposure and social support seemed to influence presence or absence of PS after the terrorist attack and highlight the need for strategies to reach out to people regardless of the type of exposure.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.subject.enMental health disorders
dc.subject.enPsychosocial support
dc.subject.enTerror-exposed people
dc.subject.enTerrorist attack
dc.title.enShort-Term Psychological Support for Civilians Exposed to the January 2015 Terrorist Attacks in France
dc.title.alternativePrehosp Disaster Meden_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/s1049023x22002175en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed36472230en_US
bordeaux.journalPrehospital and Disaster Medicineen_US
bordeaux.page755-764en_US
bordeaux.volume37en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219en_US
bordeaux.issue6en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionINSERMen_US
bordeaux.teamPHARES_BPHen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.exportfalse
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Prehospital%20and%20Disaster%20Medicine&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=755-764&rft.epage=755-764&rft.eissn=1945-1938%20(Electronic)%201049-023X%20(Linking)&rft.issn=1945-1938%20(Electronic)%201049-023X%20(Linking)&rft.au=VUILLERMOZ,%20Cecile&PRIETO,%20Nathalie&PIRARD,%20Philippe&BAUBET,%20Thierry&STENE,%20Lise%20Eilin&rft.genre=article


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record