Afficher la notice abrégée

hal.structure.identifierCentre Émile Durkheim [CED]
dc.contributor.authorROGER, Antoine
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn0950-5431
dc.description.abstractEnIn Romania, agricultural researchers are enlisted to promote the agrochemical industry and large-scale intensive agriculture. This role can be made intelligible through notion of a scientific field, highlighting rivalries between the Academy of Agricultural Sciences and the University sector. The former has lost its public funding but maintains its responsibilities within bodies devising and leading agricultural policy. The latter gives primacy to peer recognition and integration within international networks, but lacks co-financing required for being effectively included in international research projects. Each academic institution tries to devalue the rival's strong points and gain recognition for the superior value of its own assets. The funding provided by the private agrochemical industry adapts to the scientific field's structure: leading multinational firms take advantage of rivalries between academic institutions and fuel them at the same time. They consolidate current orientation taken by members of the Academy of Agricultural Sciences, especially when seeking their support for authorization for seeds and plant-protection products. Industry funds also create new rewards for University staff, emphasizing international connections but disconnecting them from purely academic achievements. Meanwhile Romanian agronomists tend to defend the type of agriculture promising the most significant business opportunities for the agrochemical industry. Thus, it uses institutional rivalries for its agenda, though without directly influencing the direction of research.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis (Routledge)
dc.subject.enagriculture
dc.subject.enagronomy
dc.subject.enagrochemical industry
dc.subject.enacademic rivalries
dc.subject.enfield theory
dc.subject.enRomania
dc.title.enAgricultural Research in Romania: Rival Institutional Dependencies on Private Companies
dc.typeArticle de revue
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09505431.2014.884064
dc.subject.halSciences de l'Homme et Société/Science politique
bordeaux.journalScience as Culture
bordeaux.page465-492
bordeaux.volume23
bordeaux.issue4
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierhalshs-00968811
hal.version1
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//halshs-00968811v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Science%20as%20Culture&rft.date=2014&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=465-492&rft.epage=465-492&rft.eissn=0950-5431&rft.issn=0950-5431&rft.au=ROGER,%20Antoine&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée