Show simple item record

hal.structure.identifierBiodiversité, Gènes & Communautés [BioGeCo]
dc.contributor.authorJACTEL, H.
hal.structure.identifierFonctionnement et conduite des systèmes de culture tropicaux et méditerranéens [UMR SYSTEM]
dc.contributor.authorGRITTI, E.
hal.structure.identifierSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences = Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet [SLU]
dc.contributor.authorDRÖSSLER, L.
dc.contributor.authorFORRESTER, D.
dc.contributor.authorMASON, W.
hal.structure.identifierCentre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive [CEFE]
dc.contributor.authorMORIN, Xavier
hal.structure.identifierTechnische Universität Munchen - Technical University Munich - Université Technique de Munich [TUM]
dc.contributor.authorPRETZSCH, H.
hal.structure.identifierBiodiversité, Gènes & Communautés [BioGeCo]
dc.contributor.authorCASTAGNEYROL, B.
dc.date.issued2018-04-11
dc.identifier.issn1744-9561
dc.description.abstractEnWhile it is widely acknowledged that forest biodiversity contributes to climate change mitigation through improved carbon sequestration, conversely how climate affects tree species diversity–forest productivity relationships is still poorly understood. We combined the results of long-term experiments where forest mixtures and corresponding monocultures were compared on the same site to estimate the yield of mixed-species stands at a global scale, and its response to climatic factors. We found positive mixture effects on productivity using a meta-analysis of 126 case studies established at 60 sites spread across five continents. Overall, the productivity of mixed-species forests was 15% greater than the average of their component monocultures, and not statistically lower than the productivity of the best component monoculture. Productivity gains in mixed-species stands were not affected by tree age or stand species composition but significantly increased with local precipitation. The results should guide better use of tree species combinations in managed forests and suggest that increased drought severity under climate change might reduce the atmospheric carbon sequestration capacity of natural forests.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherRoyal Society, The
dc.subject.enoveryielding
dc.subject.enecosystem functioning
dc.subject.enprecipitation
dc.subject.enmeta-analysis
dc.subject.enbiodiversity
dc.title.enPositive biodiversity–productivity relationships in forests: climate matters
dc.typeArticle de revue
dc.identifier.doi10.1098/rsbl.2017.0747
dc.subject.halSciences de l'environnement/Biodiversité et Ecologie
dc.subject.halSciences de l'environnement/Milieux et Changements globaux
bordeaux.journalBiology Letters
bordeaux.page20170747
bordeaux.volume14
bordeaux.issue4
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierhal-02474756
hal.version1
hal.popularnon
hal.audienceInternationale
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//hal-02474756v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Biology%20Letters&rft.date=2018-04-11&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=20170747&rft.epage=20170747&rft.eissn=1744-9561&rft.issn=1744-9561&rft.au=JACTEL,%20H.&GRITTI,%20E.&DR%C3%96SSLER,%20L.&FORRESTER,%20D.&MASON,%20W.&rft.genre=article


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record