Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierInstitut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie [I2M]
dc.contributor.authorYAN, Xingyu
hal.structure.identifierInstitut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie [I2M]
dc.contributor.authorBALLU, Alex
IDREF: 106013637
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-12T13:11:52Z
dc.date.available2022-10-12T13:11:52Z
dc.date.issued2019-03-01
dc.identifier.issn1530-9827en_US
dc.identifier.urioai:crossref.org:10.1115/1.4041476
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/157793
dc.description.abstractEnComputer-aided tolerancing (CAT) aims to predict and control geometrical and dimensional deviations in the early design stage. Former simulation models based on the translation and rotation of nominal features cannot fulfill engineering demands or cover the product lifecycle. Nonideal feature-based simulation methods are, therefore, drawing a great deal of research attention. Two general problems for non-ideal feature-based methods are how to simulate manufacturing defects and how to integrate these defects into tolerance analysis. In this paper, we focus on the first problem. There are already many manufacturing defect simulation methods. Although they are derived from different fields and have different names, they share common characteristics in application. In this study, we collected different simulation methods and classified them as random noise methods, mesh morphing methods, and mode-based methods. The theoretical backgrounds of these methods are introduced, and the simulation examples are conducted on a consistency model to show their differences. Criteria such as multiscale, surface complexity, measurement data integration, parametric control, and calculation complexity are proposed to compare these methods. Based on these analyses, the advantages and drawbacks of each method are pointed out, which may help researchers and engineers to choose suitable methods for their work.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.sourcecrossref
dc.subjectComputer-aided tolerancing
dc.subjectManufacturing defects
dc.subjectSkin model shapes
dc.subjectDeviation simulation
dc.title.enReview and Comparison of Form Error Simulation Methods for Computer Aided Tolerancing
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4041476en_US
dc.subject.halSciences de l'ingénieur [physics]/Matériauxen_US
bordeaux.journalJournal of Computing and Information Science in Engineeringen_US
bordeaux.volume19en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesInstitut de Mécanique et d’Ingénierie de Bordeaux (I2M) - UMR 5295en_US
bordeaux.issue1en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionBordeaux INPen_US
bordeaux.institutionCNRSen_US
bordeaux.institutionINRAEen_US
bordeaux.institutionArts et Métiersen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.import.sourcedissemin
hal.identifierhal-03812194
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2022-10-12T13:11:53Z
hal.exporttrue
workflow.import.sourcedissemin
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Computing%20and%20Information%20Science%20in%20Engineering&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.eissn=1530-9827&rft.issn=1530-9827&rft.au=YAN,%20Xingyu&BALLU,%20Alex&rft.genre=article


Archivos en el ítem

ArchivosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay archivos asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem