Afficher la notice abrégée

hal.structure.identifierCREAF - Centre for Ecological Research and Applied Forestries
hal.structure.identifierUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona = Autonomous University of Barcelona = Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona [UAB]
dc.contributor.authorESPELTA, Josep Maria
hal.structure.identifierCREAF - Centre for Ecological Research and Applied Forestries
hal.structure.identifierUniversidad de Alcalá - University of Alcalá [UAH]
dc.contributor.authorCRUZ‐ALONSO, Verónica
hal.structure.identifierCREAF - Centre for Ecological Research and Applied Forestries
hal.structure.identifierWilfrid Laurier University [WLU]
dc.contributor.authorALFARO‐SÁNCHEZ, Raquel
hal.structure.identifierBiodiversité, Gènes & Communautés [BioGeCo]
dc.contributor.authorHAMPE, Arndt
hal.structure.identifierUniversité du Québec à Montréal = University of Québec in Montréal [UQAM]
hal.structure.identifierInstitut des Sciences de la Forêt tempérée (ISFORT)
dc.contributor.authorMESSIER, Christian
hal.structure.identifierCREAF - Centre for Ecological Research and Applied Forestries
hal.structure.identifierUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona = Autonomous University of Barcelona = Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona [UAB]
dc.contributor.authorPINO, Joan
dc.date2020
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0021-8901
dc.description.abstractEnSince the mid-20th Century, Europe has experienced an unprecedented forest expansion associated with the abandonment of rural landscapes. Secondary forests may provide relevant ecosystem services such as landscape defragmentation, biodiversity conservation, control of hydrological cycling and carbon sequestration. Secondary forests may benefit from the legacies of the former agricultural land use, and exhibit enhanced growth. Moreover, they may differ from long-established forests in terms of tree species composition and diversity, as community composition has been less modified by succession or management. However, we lack evidence whether the effects of land use legacies on tree species diversity may also result in differences in the response of secondary forests to biotic and abiotic disturbances. We aimed to evaluate the effects of land use legacies on taxonomic and functional diversity and their effects on the response of temperate broadleaf forests to drought and herbivory damage. For this aim, we compared secondary beechFagus sylvaticaforests established after 1950 in abandoned pastures with long-established (pre-1950) forests. We calculated indices of taxonomic and functional diversity and determined mean growth and growth response of beech to two drought events (1991, 2006), and insect herbivory damage. Secondary and long-established beech forests marginally differed in species richness but the former exhibited a significantly higher Shannon diversity index and evenness. Yet, differences in taxonomic diversity did not result in differences in functional diversity between forest types. Mean tree growth was higher in secondary than in long-established forests and it increased with functional diversity in both forest types. However, diversity was unrelated with the growth response to drought. Insect herbivory damage decreased with increasing functional diversity but only in secondary forests. Synthesis and applications. Promoting functional diversity in temperate broadleaf forests is a promising strategy for enhancing productivity (tree growth) while increasing the ability to cope with biotic disturbances (insect herbivory). This principle should be applied both in the management of long-established as well as expanding secondary forests. Yet, functional diversity does not seem to ameliorate tree response to drought, highlighting the need for other silvicultural practices to address this environmental challenge.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.subject.enbeech
dc.subject.enclimate change
dc.subject.endrought
dc.subject.enforest expansion
dc.subject.enfunctional diversity
dc.subject.enherbivory
dc.subject.enland use legacies
dc.subject.enresilience
dc.title.enFunctional diversity enhances tree growth and reduces herbivory damage in secondary broadleaf forests, but does not influence resilience to drought
dc.typeArticle de revue
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1365-2664.13728
dc.subject.halSciences de l'environnement
bordeaux.journalJournal of Applied Ecology
bordeaux.page1-11
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierhal-02925961
hal.version1
hal.popularnon
hal.audienceInternationale
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//hal-02925961v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Applied%20Ecology&rft.date=2020&rft.spage=1-11&rft.epage=1-11&rft.eissn=0021-8901&rft.issn=0021-8901&rft.au=ESPELTA,%20Josep%20Maria&CRUZ%E2%80%90ALONSO,%20Ver%C3%B3nica&ALFARO%E2%80%90S%C3%81NCHEZ,%20Raquel&HAMPE,%20Arndt&MESSIER,%20Christian&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée