Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorCORNUT, T.
dc.contributor.authorTOUBOUL, D.
dc.contributor.authorROUGLAN, S.
dc.contributor.authorTELLOUCK, L.
dc.contributor.authorTELLOUCK, J.
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorKOROBELNIK, Jean-Francois
ORCID: 0000-0002-4438-9535
IDREF: 028739272
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorSCHWEITZER, Cedric
ORCID: 0000-0002-2162-9479
IDREF: 133631583
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-02T10:17:12Z
dc.date.available2020-11-02T10:17:12Z
dc.date.issued2018-04-20
dc.identifier.issn1773-0597 (Electronic) 0181-5512 (Linking)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/11568
dc.description.abstractEnPURPOSE: To compare precision in toric intraocular lens (TIOL) alignment and refractive outcomes between an intraoperative automated digital marker system and the conventional manual-ink marking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective single center study including consecutive patients undergoing uneventful cataract surgery with corneal astigmatism greater than 1 diopter. Total corneal astigmatism was measured using a placido-dual Scheimpflug system (GalileiG4((R)), Ziemer). Acrysof((R)) SN6AT (Alcon) TIOL's were implanted, and patients were divided into 2 groups, the digital group (Verion((R)), Alcon) and the ink-marking group (Pendular marker, AMO). Mean error in TIOL axis, visual acuity and residual astigmatism were analyzed at 3 days, one month and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: In total, 45 eyes of 30 patients were included (n=25 digital group, n=20 ink-marking group). The mean preoperative total corneal astigmatism was 1.71+/-0.53 diopters. At one month, there was a significantly lower mean average error in TIOL axis in the digital group compared to the ink-marking group (2.6+/-2.3 degrees and 6.4+/-2.8 degrees respectively, P=0.009). At 6months, these results remained statistically significant. Mean residual astigmatism was 0.7+/-0.4 diopters at one month, without significant difference between the two groups (P=0.9). The rate of misalignment less than or equal to 5 degrees was 86 % (n=25) in the digital group and 63 % (n=20) in the ink-marking group (P=0.05). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative digital marker system is associated with better TIOL alignment accuracy and better reproducibility than the manual ink-marking method.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.subject.enLEHA
dc.titleRésultats refractifs et évaluation de la précision du positionnement des implants toriques à l'aide d'un système d'alignement automatisé
dc.title.alternativeJ Fr Ophtalmolen_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jfo.2017.09.012en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed29685740en_US
bordeaux.journalJournal Français D'Ophtalmologieen_US
bordeaux.page291-301en_US
bordeaux.volume41en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - U1219en_US
bordeaux.issue4en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.teamLEHA_BPH
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-03194250
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2021-04-09T12:06:30Z
hal.exporttrue
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.title=R%C3%A9sultats%20refractifs%20et%20%C3%A9valuation%20de%20la%20pr%C3%A9cision%20du%20positionnement%20des%20implants%20toriques%20%C3%A0%20l'aide%20d'un%20syst%C3%A8me%20&rft.atitle=R%C3%A9sultats%20refractifs%20et%20%C3%A9valuation%20de%20la%20pr%C3%A9cision%20du%20positionnement%20des%20implants%20toriques%20%C3%A0%20l'aide%20d'un%20syst%C3%A8me%2&rft.jtitle=Journal%20Fran%C3%A7ais%20D'Ophtalmologie&rft.date=2018-04-20&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=291-301&rft.epage=291-301&rft.eissn=1773-0597%20(Electronic)%200181-5512%20(Linking)&rft.issn=1773-0597%20(Electronic)%200181-5512%20(Linking)&rft.au=CORNUT,%20T.&TOUBOUL,%20D.&ROUGLAN,%20S.&TELLOUCK,%20L.&TELLOUCK,%20J.&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée