Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorOUVRARD-BROUILLOU, Camille
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorMEILLON, Celine
ORCID: 0000-0001-7891-9648
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorDARTIGUES, Jean-Francois
ORCID: 0000-0001-9482-5529
IDREF: 058586105
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorTABUE TEGUO, Maturin
ORCID: 0000-0002-1211-5660
IDREF: 175400768
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorAVILA-FUNES, Jose Alberto
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorAMIEVA, Helene
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-09T09:48:12Z
dc.date.available2020-07-09T09:48:12Z
dc.date.issued2019-02
dc.identifier.issn2260-1341 (Print) 2260-1341en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/10269
dc.description.abstractEnBACKGROUND: Low socioeconomic status and frailty are factors of vulnerability in old age. They are both well-known risk factors of death. On the other hand, low socioeconomic status has been reported as a predictor of frailty, which questions the relationship between socioeconomic status, frailty and death. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this work was to explore the respective contribution of psychosocioeconomic precariousness - which covers socioeconomic status and also psychosocial vulnerability - and frailty in predicting mortality. DESIGN: Prospective population-based study. SETTING: Three-City (3C) Bordeaux study, France. PARTICIPANTS: The sample consisted of 1586 subjects aged 65 or older. MEASUREMENTS: Psychosocioeconomic precariousness was assessed utilizing a structured instrument which assessed poor socioeconomic status, and psychosocial vulnerability. Frailty status was defined by Fried's phenotype. RESULTS: After 14 years of follow-up, 665 deaths (42%) occurred. Psychosocioeconomic precariousness and frailty had both an independent contribution to mortality prediction (hazard ratio (HR) 1.51 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-2.07)) and (HR 1.68 (95% CI 1.19-2.38)), respectively. Such relationships were adjusted for age, sex, disability, and comorbidities. No interaction term was found between precariousness and frailty. CONCLUSIONS: If psychosocioeconomic precariousness and frailty are both aspects of vulnerability in old age, they have a non-overlapping contribution in the prediction of mortality. These findings emphasize the importance of considering both psychosocioeconomic precariousness and frailty when identifying elderly people at risk of death.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.subject.enSEPIA
dc.title.enPsychosocioeconomic Precariousness and Frailty: The Respective Contribution in Predicting Mortality
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.14283/jfa.2018.36en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed30734831en_US
bordeaux.journalThe Journal of Frailty & Agingen_US
bordeaux.page42-47en_US
bordeaux.volume8en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219en_US
bordeaux.issue1en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-03211437
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2021-04-28T14:59:18Z
hal.exporttrue
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20Frailty%20&%20Aging&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=42-47&rft.epage=42-47&rft.eissn=2260-1341%20(Print)%202260-1341&rft.issn=2260-1341%20(Print)%202260-1341&rft.au=OUVRARD-BROUILLOU,%20Camille&MEILLON,%20Celine&DARTIGUES,%20Jean-Francois&TABUE%20TEGUO,%20Maturin&AVILA-FUNES,%20Jose%20Alberto&rft.genre=article


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record