Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorPOISEUIL, Marie
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorCOUREAU, Gaelle
dc.contributor.authorPAYET, C.
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorSAVES, Marianne
dc.contributor.authorDEBLED, M.
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorMATHOULIN-PELISSIER, Simone
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorAMADEO, Brice
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-09T06:19:25Z
dc.date.available2020-07-09T06:19:25Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-20
dc.identifier.issn1877-7821en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/10226
dc.description.abstractEnBACKGROUND: Some studies have investigated the role of socio-demographic inequalities in the association between screening and survival. However, in France, no study has been conducted to describe the socio-demographic characteristics and survival of women with breast cancer based on their participation to mass screening. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of socio-demographic inequalities on the association between participation in mass screening program and survival of women with breast cancer. METHODS: Data for 2,244 women aged 50-74 years diagnosed with breast cancer over the period 2008-2010 were obtained from the cancer registry and the screening structure of Gironde. We used the aggregated European Deprivation Index (EDI) to define the deprivation level of women. Net survival rates were estimated with the Pohar-Perme method, with and without correcting for lead-time bias. RESULTS: Survival rates were lower for non-attenders than for screen-detected women (83.8% vs 97.3%, p < 0.0001), even after correcting for lead-time bias. Among the most deprived women, the survival rate was significantly different between non-attenders and screen-detected women (78.1% vs 95.6%, p = 0.0002), suggesting an important effect of mass screening in this group. CONCLUSION: The introduction of incentive actions in deprived areas could play a key role in the adherence of women to mass screening and in improving their survival in case of a breast cancer diagnosis.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.subject.enEPICENE
dc.title.enDeprivation and mass screening: Survival of women diagnosed with breast cancer in France from 2008 to 2010
dc.title.alternativeCancer Epidemiolen_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.canep.2019.03.016en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed31015096en_US
bordeaux.journalCancer Epidemiologyen_US
bordeaux.page149-155en_US
bordeaux.volume60en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.teamEPICENE_BPH
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-03209451
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2021-04-27T09:10:59Z
hal.exporttrue
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&amp;rft.jtitle=Cancer%20Epidemiology&amp;rft.date=2019-04-20&amp;rft.volume=60&amp;rft.spage=149-155&amp;rft.epage=149-155&amp;rft.eissn=1877-7821&amp;rft.issn=1877-7821&amp;rft.au=POISEUIL,%20Marie&amp;COUREAU,%20Gaelle&amp;PAYET,%20C.&amp;SAVES,%20Marianne&amp;DEBLED,%20M.&amp;rft.genre=article


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record