Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorMOUTEL, G.
dc.contributor.authorDUCHANGE, N.
dc.contributor.authorLIEVRE, A.
dc.contributor.authorORGERIE, M. B.
dc.contributor.authorJULLIAN, O.
dc.contributor.authorSANCHO-GARNIER, H.
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorDARQUY, Silviane
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-03T13:31:44Z
dc.date.available2020-07-03T13:31:44Z
dc.date.issued2019-01
dc.identifier.issn1473-5709 (Electronic) 0959-8278 (Linking)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/8565
dc.description.abstractEnInternational studies have shown a significant reduction in colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality following the implementation of organized screening programs, given a sufficient participation rate and adequate follow-up. The French national CRC screening program has been generalized since 2008 and targets 18 million men and women aged 50-74 years. Despite broad recommendations, the participation rate remains low (29.8%), questioning the efficiency of the program. A panel of experts was appointed by the French National Cancer Institute to critically examine the place of autonomy and efficiency in CRC screening and propose recommendations. In this paper, we explore the ethical significance of a public health intervention that falls short of its objectives owing to low take-up by the population targeted. First, we analyze the reasons for the low CRC screening participation. Second, we examine the models that can be proposed for public health actions, reconciling respect for the individual and the collective good. Our expert panel explored possible ways to enhance take-up of CRC screening within the bounds of individual autonomy, adapting awareness campaigns, and new educational approaches that take into account knowledge and analysis of sociocultural hurdles. Although public health actions must be universal, target actions should nonetheless be developed for nonparticipating population subgroups.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.subject.enEPICENE
dc.title.enLow participation in organized colorectal cancer screening in France: underlying ethical issues
dc.title.alternativeEur J Cancer Preven_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/cej.0000000000000417en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed29176350en_US
bordeaux.journalEuropean Journal of Cancer Preventionen_US
bordeaux.page27-32en_US
bordeaux.volume28en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219en_US
bordeaux.issue1en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.teamEPICENE_BPH
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-03167624
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2021-03-12T10:37:23Z
hal.exporttrue
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=European%20Journal%20of%20Cancer%20Prevention&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=27-32&rft.epage=27-32&rft.eissn=1473-5709%20(Electronic)%200959-8278%20(Linking)&rft.issn=1473-5709%20(Electronic)%200959-8278%20(Linking)&rft.au=MOUTEL,%20G.&DUCHANGE,%20N.&LIEVRE,%20A.&ORGERIE,%20M.%20B.&JULLIAN,%20O.&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée