Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierGroupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée [GREThA]
dc.contributor.authorAUGERAUD VERON, Emmanuelle
dc.contributor.authorFABBRI, Giorgio
dc.contributor.authorSCHUBERT, Katheline
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-17T08:24:38Z
dc.date.available2020-06-17T08:24:38Z
dc.date.issued2019-03-19
dc.identifier.issn0002-9092en_US
dc.identifier.urioai:crossref.org:10.1093/ajae/aaz002
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/7962
dc.description.abstractEnThis paper presents a benchmark stochastic endogenous growth model of an agricultural economy. Producing food requires land, and increasing the share of total land devoted to farming mechanically reduces the share of land devoted to biodiversity conservation. However, safeguarding a greater number of species guarantees better ecosystem services, which in turn ensure lower volatility of agricultural productivity. The optimal conversion/conservation rule is explicitly characterized. Value of biodiversity is considered in its function of hedging against the volatility of agricultural production. Two aspects of biodiversity's value are examined. We first consider the total value of biodiversity as the welfare gain from biodiversity conservation, that is, the percentage increase in consumption that the society is willing to accept to give up the optimal level of biodiversity in favor of no biodiversity at all. We then consider the insurance value of biodiversity, extending the usual concepts to our stochastic dynamic framework, defining the insurance value of biodiversity as the change of the risk premium due to a marginal change in the level of biodiversity. To highlight the impact of risk on the optimal decision as in the value of biodiversity, we use the Epstein‐Zin‐Weil specification of preferences and represent preferences by a recursive utility function. This allows us to disentangle the effects of risk aversion and aversion to fluctuations. Thus, the preference for some rather uncertain outcomes and the propensity to smooth consumption over time are represented by two distinct parameters, and the effect of each of them are studied.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.sourcecrossref
dc.subject.enBiodiversity
dc.subject.eninsurance value
dc.subject.enrecursive preferences
dc.subject.enstochastic endogenous growth
dc.title.enThe Value of Biodiversity as an Insurance Device
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ajae/aaz002
dc.subject.halÉconomie et finance quantitative [q-fin]en_US
bordeaux.journalAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economicsen_US
bordeaux.page1068-1081en_US
bordeaux.volume101en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesGroupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA) - UMR 5113en_US
bordeaux.issue4en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.import.sourcedissemin
hal.identifierhal-03143888
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2021-02-17T09:09:51Z
hal.exporttrue
workflow.import.sourcedissemin
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=American%20Journal%20of%20Agricultural%20Economics&rft.date=2019-03-19&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1068-1081&rft.epage=1068-1081&rft.eissn=0002-9092&rft.issn=0002-9092&rft.au=AUGERAUD%20VERON,%20Emmanuelle&FABBRI,%20Giorgio&SCHUBERT,%20Katheline&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée