Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorDAIEN, V.
dc.contributor.authorFINGER, R. P.
dc.contributor.authorTALKS, J. S.
dc.contributor.authorMITCHELL, P.
dc.contributor.authorWONG, T. Y.
dc.contributor.authorSAKAMOTO, T.
dc.contributor.authorELDEM, B. M.
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorKOROBELNIK, Jean-Francois
ORCID: 0000-0002-4438-9535
IDREF: 028739272
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-22T09:59:48Z
dc.date.available2021-03-22T09:59:48Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-21
dc.identifier.issn0007-1161en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/26752
dc.description.abstractEnThe aim of this work was to evaluate the contribution of real-world evidence (RWE) in changing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy treatment practices and improving real-world treatment strategies for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).A PubMed literature search was performed to review the large number of English-language studies conducted to investigate the real-world effectiveness of anti-VEGF (aflibercept and ranibizumab) treatment paradigms available for nAMD.The evidence for pro re nata (PRN), treat-and-extend (T&E) and fixed bimonthly dosing regimens for anti-VEGF treatment of nAMD were reviewed and findings are summarised. RWE demonstrated that T&E regimens optimise visual outcomes while reducing burden on patients, clinics and physicians, compared with both fixed-dose and PRN regimens.RWE has helped to develop and improve real-world treatment strategies in nAMD, with the aim of optimising visual outcomes and reducing treatment burden in clinical practice. Of the various regimens, a T&E regimen is most likely to adequately balance clinical outcomes and treatment burden for patients with nAMD.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/*
dc.title.enEvolution of treatment paradigms in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a review of real-world evidence
dc.title.alternativeBr J Ophthalmolen_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-317434en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed33130553en_US
bordeaux.journalThe British Journal of Ophthalmologyen_US
bordeaux.volume105
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219en_US
bordeaux.issue11
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.teamLEHA_BPH
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-03176168
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2021-03-22T09:59:53Z
hal.exporttrue
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=The%20British%20Journal%20of%20Ophthalmology&rft.date=2021-10-21&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=11&rft.eissn=0007-1161&rft.issn=0007-1161&rft.au=DAIEN,%20V.&FINGER,%20R.%20P.&TALKS,%20J.%20S.&MITCHELL,%20P.&WONG,%20T.%20Y.&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée