Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorDEVILLIER, P.
dc.contributor.authorDEMOLY, P.
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorMOLIMARD, Mathieu
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-21T15:33:10Z
dc.date.available2021-01-21T15:33:10Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1747-6356 (Electronic) 1747-6348 (Linking)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/25946
dc.description.abstractEnIntroduction: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) show that allergen immunotherapy (AIT) has proven long-term efficacy in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). However, RCTs have limited generalizability and there is growing recognition that real-world evidence (RWE) is necessary to provide complementary data to those of RCTs, and corroborate their findings. Until recently, data from the real-world setting investigating the benefits of AIT for the treatment of patients with grass and birch pollen-associated AR were sparse, but new retrospective claims database studies from France and Germany have confirmed the sustained benefits of grass and birch pollen AIT in terms of significantly reduced progression of AR and asthma, and a significantly decreased risk of new-onset asthma. Areas covered: Here, we review the value of RWE used alongside data from traditional RCTs, and its potential strengths and limitations, and summarize the findings of the recent RWE studies investigating the benefits of AIT for the management of patients with grass and birch pollen-associated AR. Expert opinion: There is growing recognition of the necessity and value of RWE as a complement to data acquired in RCTs, to better understand the effects of AIT treatments in a broader, more representative patient population, and to help guide clinical decision-making.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectPharmacoEpi-Drugs
dc.title.enAllergen immunotherapy: what is the added value of real-world evidence from retrospective claims database studies?
dc.title.alternativeExpert Rev Respir Meden_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/17476348.2020.1733417en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed32131649en_US
bordeaux.journalExpert Review of Respiratory Medicineen_US
bordeaux.page445-452en_US
bordeaux.volume14en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219en_US
bordeaux.issue5en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.teamPharmacoEpi-Drugsen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.exportfalse
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Expert%20Review%20of%20Respiratory%20Medicine&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=445-452&rft.epage=445-452&rft.eissn=1747-6356%20(Electronic)%201747-6348%20(Linking)&rft.issn=1747-6356%20(Electronic)%201747-6348%20(Linking)&rft.au=DEVILLIER,%20P.&DEMOLY,%20P.&MOLIMARD,%20Mathieu&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée