Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire de l'intégration, du matériau au système [IMS]
dc.contributor.authorRAVELOMANANTSOA, Michel Stella
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire de l'intégration, du matériau au système [IMS]
dc.contributor.authorDUCQ, Yves
ORCID: 0000-0001-5144-5876
IDREF: 119003791
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire de l'intégration, du matériau au système [IMS]
hal.structure.identifierUniversité de Bordeaux [UB]
dc.contributor.authorVALLESPIR, Bruno
IDREF: 033318603
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-11T16:39:21Z
dc.date.available2020-02-11T16:39:21Z
dc.date.issued2018-09-04
dc.identifier.issn0020-7543en_US
dc.identifier.urioai:crossref.org:10.1080/00207543.2018.1506178
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/23
dc.description.abstractEnTo control their enterprises in a complex environment, decision-makers need to measure their enterprise regularly to perpetuate. For that, they use a specific set of performance indicators grouped in a coherent system named performance measurement systems (PMS). Such systems are generally defined and implemented using different methods. As business performance measurement appeared from the 1900s, a large number of approaches developed by researchers and practitioners have appeared since those years until today. They were not designed for the same purpose and on the same basis and each of them has advantages and disadvantages to measure optimally the performance. So, decision-makers have difficulties to choose among these methods the most appropriate to their needs when they want to design and implement their customised PMS. The objective of this paper is to present the main concepts that approaches are based on, to present a state of the art as exhaustive as possible of the approaches and methods themselves and to make a comparison between them in order to allow decision-makers to choose among them the one or a combination of several ones which would efficiently suit to their needs to reach their global objective of PMS design and implementation.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.sourcecrossref
dc.subject.enperformance measure
dc.subject.enperformance management
dc.subject.enmanufacturing management
dc.subject.enperformance indicator
dc.subject.enmethods
dc.subject.encomparison of methods
dc.title.enA state of the art and comparison of approaches for performance measurement systems definition and design
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00207543.2018.1506178
dc.subject.halSciences de l'ingénieur [physics]/Autreen_US
bordeaux.journalInternational Journal of Production Researchen_US
bordeaux.page1-21en_US
bordeaux.volume57en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesLaboratoire d’Intégration du Matériau au Système (IMS) - UMR 5218en_US
bordeaux.issue15-16en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.import.sourcedissemin
hal.identifierhal-03173374
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2021-03-18T13:17:54Z
hal.exporttrue
workflow.import.sourcedissemin
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=International%20Journal%20of%20Production%20Research&rft.date=2018-09-04&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=15-16&rft.spage=1-21&rft.epage=1-21&rft.eissn=0020-7543&rft.issn=0020-7543&rft.au=RAVELOMANANTSOA,%20Michel%20Stella&DUCQ,%20Yves&VALLESPIR,%20Bruno&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée