Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorKEPP, Kasper P
dc.contributor.authorHOILUND-CARLSEN, Poul F
dc.contributor.authorCRISTEA, Ioana A
dc.contributor.authorCUMMING, Robert G
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorDALY, Timothy
dc.contributor.authorEMILSSON, Louise
dc.contributor.authorFLACCO, Maria E
dc.contributor.authorHEMKENS, Lars G
dc.contributor.authorJANIAUD, Perrine
dc.contributor.authorJOHNSEN, Kasper B
dc.contributor.authorLALLUKKA, Tea
dc.contributor.authorMUKA, Taulant
dc.contributor.authorNAUDET, Florian
dc.contributor.authorREVHEIM, Mona-Elisabeth R
dc.contributor.authorSQUITTI, Rosanna
dc.contributor.authorTHAMBISETTY, Madhav
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-15T13:43:41Z
dc.date.available2025-04-15T13:43:41Z
dc.date.issued2025-02-05
dc.identifier.issn1473-4877en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/206211
dc.description.abstractEnThis paper reviews the scientific evidence on new anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies for treating Alzheimer's disease as a case study for improving scientific evidence communication. We introduce five guidelines condensed from the biomedical evidence literature but adapted to the short format of science communication in e.g., journal opinion pieces and newspaper articles. Given the major importance and recent confusion regarding the discussed drugs, with certain disagreements seen e.g., between FDA and EMA, the suggested guidelines may be useful to clinicians discussing with their patients and to scientists communicating the evidence in balance. More generally, we hope that the guidelines may help us to improve communication of scientific evidence on complex topics in opinion pieces in the scientific literature, in advocacy, and in media appearances.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.subject.enAlzheimer’s Disease
dc.subject.enEvidence
dc.subject.enDonanemab
dc.subject.enHealth Policy
dc.subject.enLecanemab
dc.subject.enScience Communication
dc.title.enCommunicating scientific evidence: drugs for Alzheimer's disease as a case study
dc.title.alternativeCurr Med Res Opinen_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03007995.2025.2458530en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed39853750en_US
bordeaux.journalCurrent Medical Research and Opinionen_US
bordeaux.page347-354en_US
bordeaux.volume41en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219en_US
bordeaux.issue2en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionINSERMen_US
bordeaux.teamPHARES_BPHen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exportfalse
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Current%20Medical%20Research%20and%20Opinion&rft.date=2025-02-05&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=347-354&rft.epage=347-354&rft.eissn=1473-4877&rft.issn=1473-4877&rft.au=KEPP,%20Kasper%20P&HOILUND-CARLSEN,%20Poul%20F&CRISTEA,%20Ioana%20A&CUMMING,%20Robert%20G&DALY,%20Timothy&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée