Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorWOJCIECHOWSKI, Piotr
dc.contributor.authorWDOWIAK, Marlena
dc.contributor.authorPANEK, Malgorzata
dc.contributor.authorLUNK, Izabella
dc.contributor.authorCARRASCO, Joao
dc.contributor.authorZHANG, Xin
dc.contributor.authorWU, Olivia
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorKOROBELNIK, Jean-Francois
ORCID: 0000-0002-4438-9535
IDREF: 028739272
dc.contributor.authorLANZETTA, Paolo
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-14T09:42:04Z
dc.date.available2025-04-14T09:42:04Z
dc.date.issued2025-04-01
dc.identifier.issn2193-8245en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/206172
dc.description.abstractEnINTRODUCTION: Aflibercept 8 mg administered in extended dosing intervals has shown non-inferior visual gains and comparable safety profile to aflibercept 2 mg in the PULSAR pivotal randomized clinical trial and has the potential to reduce the treatment burden of treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). This study aimed at gathering robust evidence to assess the comparative efficacy, safety, and treatment burden of aflibercept 8 mg against other anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents as ranibizumab, brolucizumab, faricimab, and bevacizumab in patients with nAMD. METHODS: A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted, targeting clinical trials of anti-VEGF agents in patients with nAMD. The results of the SLR were included in a network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing aflibercept 8 mg to other anti-VEGF treatments in nAMD, considering a 1-year time horizon. Treatment efficacy was assessed based on the change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline, the proportion of patients gaining or losing 15 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters and changes in anatomical outcomes measured as change in central retinal thickness (CRT) or central subfield thickness (CST). Safety was assessed considering the incidence of ocular and non-ocular adverse events. Treatment burden was defined as the mean number of intravitreal injections over the study period. RESULTS: The base-case NMA involving 21 studies did not show significant differences between aflibercept 8 mg and comparators regarding BCVA change from baseline and proportion of patients with a gain or loss of ≥ 15 letters. On the anatomical endpoints, aflibercept 8 mg was associated with statistically significant improvement in CRT/CST change from baseline compared with ranibizumab in fixed and pro re nata regimens. No significant differences were identified versus the other anti-VEGF. The analysis of the safety outcomes did not identify any significant differences between aflibercept 8 mg and any of the comparators. During the first year of treatment, patients treated with aflibercept 8 mg (following 12- or 16-week injection intervals) received on average 5.9 and 5.1 injections, respectively. For the same period, patients treated with faricimab received from 6.2 to 6.7 injections, patients treated with ranibizumab from 7.62 to 12.14 injections, and patients treated with aflibercept 2 mg up to 7.67 injections. CONCLUSION: Aflibercept 8 mg demonstrates a comparable efficacy and safety to currently available anti-VEGF treatments for nAMD, with the potential added benefit of requiring fewer injections. These results suggest that aflibercept 8 mg could be a favourable treatment option for nAMD, achieving sustained disease control while alleviating the burden of injections on patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/*
dc.subject.enAflibercept 8 mg
dc.subject.enBCVA
dc.subject.enInjection frequency
dc.subject.enNeovascular age-related macular degeneration
dc.subject.enNetwork meta-analysis
dc.subject.enOcular AE
dc.subject.enSystematic literature review
dc.title.enEfficacy, Safety, and Injection Frequency with Novel Aflibercept 8 mg in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Comparison with Existing Anti-VEGF Regimens Using a Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
dc.title.alternativeOphthalmol Theren_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40123-025-01098-yen_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed39994103en_US
bordeaux.journalOphthalmology and Therapyen_US
bordeaux.page733-753en_US
bordeaux.volume14en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219en_US
bordeaux.issue4en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionINSERMen_US
bordeaux.teamLEHA_BPHen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.identifier.funderIDBayeren_US
hal.identifierhal-05033058
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2025-04-14T09:42:08Z
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exporttrue
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmology%20and%20Therapy&rft.date=2025-04-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=733-753&rft.epage=733-753&rft.eissn=2193-8245&rft.issn=2193-8245&rft.au=WOJCIECHOWSKI,%20Piotr&WDOWIAK,%20Marlena&PANEK,%20Malgorzata&LUNK,%20Izabella&CARRASCO,%20Joao&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée