Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierUniversity of Arizona [UoA]
dc.contributor.authorIGLEHART, Charles
hal.structure.identifierUniversity of California Los Angeles
dc.contributor.authorMONTI, Martin
hal.structure.identifierUniversity of California Los Angeles
dc.contributor.authorCAIN, Joshua
hal.structure.identifierNeurocentre Magendie : Physiopathologie de la Plasticité Neuronale [U1215 Inserm - UB]
dc.contributor.authorTOURDIAS, Thomas
hal.structure.identifierUniversity of Arizona [UoA]
dc.contributor.authorSARANATHAN, Manojkumar
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-18T16:52:36Z
dc.date.available2025-03-18T16:52:36Z
dc.date.issued2020-06
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/205535
dc.description.abstractEnThe thalamus consists of several histologically and functionally distinct nuclei increasingly implicated in brain pathology and important for treatment, motivating the need for development of fast and accurate thalamic parcellation. The contrast between thalamic nuclei as well as between the thalamus and surrounding tissues is poor in T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), inhibiting efforts to date to segment the thalamus using standard clinical MRI. Automatic parcellation techniques have been developed to leverage thalamic features better captured by advanced MRI methods, including magnetization prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (MP-RAGE), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and resting-state functional MRI (fMRI). Despite operating on fundamentally different image contrasts, these methods claim a high degree of agreement with the Morel stereotactic atlas of the thalamus. However, no comparison has been undertaken to compare the results of these disparate parcellation methods. We have implemented state-of-the-art structural-, diffusion-, and functional imaging-based thalamus parcellation techniques and used them on a single set of subjects. We present the first systematic qualitative and quantitative comparison of these methods. The results show that DTI parcellation agrees more with structural parcellation in the larger thalamic nuclei, while rsfMRI parcellation agrees more with structural parcellation in the smaller nuclei. Structural parcellation is the most accurate in the delineation of small structures such as the habenular, antero-ventral, and medial geniculate nuclei. © 2020, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.subject.enDiffusion tensor imaging
dc.subject.enMP-RAGE
dc.subject.enResting-state functional MRI
dc.subject.enThalamus nuclei parcellation
dc.title.enA systematic comparison of structural-, structural connectivity-, and functional connectivity-based thalamus parcellation techniques
dc.title.alternativeBrain Struct Functen_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00429-020-02085-8en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Neurosciences [q-bio.NC]en_US
dc.identifier.pubmed32440784en_US
bordeaux.journalBrain Structure and Functionen_US
bordeaux.page1631-1642en_US
bordeaux.volume225en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesNeurocentre Magendie - U1215en_US
bordeaux.issue5en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionINSERMen_US
bordeaux.teamRelations glie-neuroneen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-04996173
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2025-03-18T16:52:38Z
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exporttrue
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Brain%20Structure%20and%20Function&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=225&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1631-1642&rft.epage=1631-1642&rft.au=IGLEHART,%20Charles&MONTI,%20Martin&CAIN,%20Joshua&TOURDIAS,%20Thomas&SARANATHAN,%20Manojkumar&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée