Afficher la notice abrégée

hal.structure.identifierBiodiversité, Gènes & Communautés [BioGeCo]
dc.contributor.authorPAPIN, Victor
hal.structure.identifierThe Roslin Institute
hal.structure.identifierUniversity of Edinburgh [Edin.]
dc.contributor.authorGORJANC, Gregor
hal.structure.identifierThe Roslin Institute
hal.structure.identifierUniversity of Edinburgh [Edin.]
dc.contributor.authorPOCRNIC, Ivan
hal.structure.identifierBiodiversité, Gènes & Communautés [BioGeCo]
dc.contributor.authorBOUFFIER, Laurent
hal.structure.identifierBiologie intégrée pour la valorisation de la diversité des Arbres et de la Forêt [BioForA]
dc.contributor.authorSANCHEZ, Leopoldo
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-18T03:02:18Z
dc.date.available2025-01-18T03:02:18Z
dc.date.issued2024-12-30
dc.identifier.issn1286-4560
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/204381
dc.description.abstractEn<div><p>Key message Based on experimental and simulated data for maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) in a genomic selection context, our study reveals that the often-highlighted equivalence between genome-based and pedigree-based prediction accuracies of breeding values is associated with a zero accuracy of genome-based prediction within families, which can be attributed to the still insufficient size of the genomic training sets for conifers.</p><p>Context Genomic selection is a promising approach for forest tree breeding. However, its advantage in terms of prediction accuracy over conventional pedigree-based methods is unclear and within-family accuracy is rarely assessed.</p></div> <div>Aims<p>We used a pedigree-based model (ABLUP) with corrected pedigree data as a baseline reference for assessing the prediction accuracy of genome-based model (GBLUP) at the global and within-family levels in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait).</p></div> <div>Methods<p>We considered 39 full-sib families, each comprising 10 to 40 individuals, to constitute an experimental population of 833 individuals. A stochastic simulation model was also developed to explore other scenarios of heritability, training set size, and marker density.</p></div> <div>Results<p>Prediction accuracies with GBLUP and ABLUP were similar, and within-family accuracy with GBLUP was on average zero with large variation between families. Simulations revealed that the number of individuals in the training set was the principal factor limiting GBLUP accuracy in our study and likely in many forest tree breeding programmes. Accurate within-family prediction is possible if 40-65 individuals per full-sib family are included in the genomic training set, from a total of 1600-2000 individuals in the training set.</p></div> <div>Conclusions<p>The increase in the number of individuals per family in the training set lead to a significant advantage of GBLUP over ABLUP in terms of prediction accuracy and more clearly justify the switch to genome-based prediction and selection in forest trees.</p></div>
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Nature (since 2011)/EDP Science (until 2010)
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
dc.subject.enBreeding programme
dc.subject.enGenomic selection
dc.subject.enMaritime pine
dc.subject.enProgeny validation
dc.subject.enStochastic simulation
dc.subject.enWithin-family variability
dc.title.enUnlocking genome-based prediction and selection in conifers: the key role of within-family prediction accuracy illustrated in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.)
dc.typeArticle de revue
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13595-024-01269-0
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]
bordeaux.journalAnnals of Forest Science
bordeaux.page52
bordeaux.volume81
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBioGeCo (Biodiversité Gènes & Communautés) - UMR 1202*
bordeaux.issue1
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeaux
bordeaux.institutionINRAE
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierhal-04892440
hal.version1
hal.popularnon
hal.audienceInternationale
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//hal-04892440v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&amp;rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20Forest%20Science&amp;rft.date=2024-12-30&amp;rft.volume=81&amp;rft.issue=1&amp;rft.spage=52&amp;rft.epage=52&amp;rft.eissn=1286-4560&amp;rft.issn=1286-4560&amp;rft.au=PAPIN,%20Victor&amp;GORJANC,%20Gregor&amp;POCRNIC,%20Ivan&amp;BOUFFIER,%20Laurent&amp;SANCHEZ,%20Leopoldo&amp;rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée