Afficher la notice abrégée

Towards a comprehensive methodology for ecotoxicological assessment: Prioritizing plant protection products for mixture testing in edge-of-field surface waterbodies

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorABRANTES, Nelson
dc.contributor.authorPEREIRA, Joana Luísa
dc.contributor.authorGONZÁLEZ, Ana-Belén Muñiz
dc.contributor.authorCAMPOS, Isabel
dc.contributor.authorNAVARRO, Irene
dc.contributor.authorDE LA TORRE, Adrián
dc.contributor.authorMARTÍNEZ, María Ángeles
dc.contributor.authorOSMAN, Rima
dc.contributor.authorKHURSHID, Chrow
dc.contributor.authorHARKES, Paula
dc.contributor.authorLWANGA, Esperanza Huerta
dc.contributor.authorALCON, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorCONTRERAS, Josefa
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorBALDI, Isabelle
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorBUREAU, Mathilde
dc.contributor.authorALAOUI, Abdallah
dc.contributor.authorCHRIST, Florian
dc.contributor.authorMANDRIOLI, Daniele
dc.contributor.authorSGARGI, Daria
dc.contributor.authorPASKOVIĆ, Igor
dc.contributor.authorPASKOVIĆ, Marija Polić
dc.contributor.authorGLAVAN, Matjaž
dc.contributor.authorHOFMAN, Jakub
dc.contributor.authorNORGAARD, Trine
dc.contributor.authorAPARICIO, Virginia
dc.contributor.authorSILVA, Vera
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-20T14:20:48Z
dc.date.available2024-11-20T14:20:48Z
dc.date.issued2024-11-05
dc.identifier.issn1879-1026en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/203374
dc.description.abstractEnPesticide applications in agriculture result in complex mixtures of Plant Protection Products (PPPs) in the environment. The ecotoxicological effects of these mixtures can occur at concentrations considered safe for individual chemicals, indicating potential risks underestimated by current regulatory assessments focused on individual active ingredients. To address this challenge, our study introduces a methodology for identifying priority PPPs for formulating mixtures, enabling further ecotoxicological testing in water and sediment compartments of edge-of-field surface water bodies, targeting pelagic and benthic organisms. This methodology was primarily based on the actual quantification of PPPs present in these compartments from selected case study sites (CSSs) in Europe and Argentina (11 and 4 for water and sediments, respectively). A conceptual framework was developed that discriminates and selects concerning PPPs based on their individual risk quotient and frequency of occurrence in each CSS, drawing upon two EU regulatory risk assessment approaches, i.e., the general approach under REACH for any environmental contaminant of concern - the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) approach; and that specifically focusing on PPPs - the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) approach. Irrespective of whether the focus is on water or sediments, the study revealed disparities in PPP rankings depending on the approach used to identify PPPs of concern, with the ECHA approach being more conservative than the EFSA approach. Despite this, the EFSA approach follows a more standardized assessment factor definition strategy, potentially allowing avoidance of risk overestimation, as well as resulting in a more balanced representation of different PPP classes for subsequent mixtures testing. Overall, the methodological development reported herein, along with the inconsistencies found when comparing different regulatory approaches to assess the risk of environmental contaminants, highlight the need for further discussion on the most appropriate directions towards the standardization of the regulatory risk assessment of PPP mixtures.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.subject.enFreshwater
dc.subject.enMixtures
dc.subject.enPesticides
dc.subject.enRisk assessment
dc.subject.enRisk quotient
dc.title.enTowards a comprehensive methodology for ecotoxicological assessment: Prioritizing plant protection products for mixture testing in edge-of-field surface waterbodies
dc.title.alternativeSci Total Environen_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177322en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed39489438en_US
bordeaux.journalScience of the Total Environmenten_US
bordeaux.page177322en_US
bordeaux.volume956en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionINSERMen_US
bordeaux.teamEPICENE_BPHen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.identifier.funderIDHorizon 2020en_US
bordeaux.import.sourcepubmed
hal.identifierhal-04793584
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2024-11-20T14:20:52Z
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exporttrue
workflow.import.sourcepubmed
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Science%20of%20the%20Total%20Environment&rft.date=2024-11-05&rft.volume=956&rft.spage=177322&rft.epage=177322&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft.issn=1879-1026&rft.au=ABRANTES,%20Nelson&PEREIRA,%20Joana%20Lu%C3%ADsa&GONZ%C3%81LEZ,%20Ana-Bel%C3%A9n%20Mu%C3%B1iz&CAMPOS,%20Isabel&NAVARRO,%20Irene&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée