Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorGRANET-VAISSIERE, E.
dc.contributor.authorLEFORT, F.
hal.structure.identifierImmunology from Concept and Experiments to Translation = Immunologie Conceptuelle, Expérimentale et Translationnelle [ImmunoConcept]
dc.contributor.authorDOMBLIDES, Charlotte
dc.contributor.authorLARROQUETTE, M.
dc.contributor.authorRAVAUD, A.
dc.contributor.authorBERNHARD, J.-C.
dc.contributor.authorGROSS-GOUPIL, M.
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-26T14:02:23Z
dc.date.available2024-09-26T14:02:23Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn2072-6694en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/201844
dc.description.abstractEnOver the past decade, major advances have been made in the treatment of advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinomas, specifically clear cell carcinomas. For many years the optimal approach was sequential; thus, monotherapies [principally tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs)] targeting angiogenesis until toxicity or progressive disease developed. The rationale was the common mechanisms of action of the targeting agents and avoidance of the risk of overlapping toxicities. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective monotherapies, and combinations thereof with anti-angiogenic agents were thus later considered. Synergistic interactions were reported in vitro. Clinical efficacy was evident in three pivotal phase III trials with axitinib-pembrolizumab, cabozantinib-nivolumab, and lenvatinib-pembrolizumab combinations. Two other combinations showed interesting results but did not improve overall survival. However, the data aided our understanding of the new therapeutic approaches. A combination of the ICIs nivolumab and ipilimumab was the first to evidence better progression-free and overall survival compared to sunitinib in patients with intermediate or unfavourable prognoses as evaluated by the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC). Here we focus on the TKI-ICI combinations, emphasising the rationale of their use and the clinical results. To date, no biomarker facilitating the selection of an optimal treatment by disease and patient status has been reported.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subject.enRenal cell carcinoma
dc.subject.enTyrosine kinase inhibitor
dc.subject.enImmune checkpoint inhibitor
dc.subject.enCombination
dc.title.enCombinations of Anti-Angiogenic Agents and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Best Option?
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/cancers15041048en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Immunologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed36831392en_US
bordeaux.journalCancersen_US
bordeaux.volume15en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesImmunoConcEpT - UMR 5164en_US
bordeaux.issue4en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionCNRSen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-04710934
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2024-09-26T14:02:25Z
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exporttrue
dc.rights.ccCC BYen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Cancers&rft.date=2023&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.eissn=2072-6694&rft.issn=2072-6694&rft.au=GRANET-VAISSIERE,%20E.&LEFORT,%20F.&DOMBLIDES,%20Charlotte&LARROQUETTE,%20M.&RAVAUD,%20A.&rft.genre=article


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record