Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

hal.structure.identifierMision Biologica de Galicia [MBG]
hal.structure.identifierCentro de Investigaciones Agrarias de Mabegondo
dc.contributor.authorQUIROGA, Gabriela
hal.structure.identifierBiodiversité, Gènes & Communautés [BioGeCo]
dc.contributor.authorCASTAGNEYROL, Bastien
hal.structure.identifierUniversidad Autónoma de Yucatán
dc.contributor.authorABDALA‐ROBERTS, Luis
hal.structure.identifierMision Biologica de Galicia [MBG]
dc.contributor.authorMOREIRA, Xoaquín
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-11T02:01:33Z
dc.date.available2024-07-11T02:01:33Z
dc.date.issued2024-03-04
dc.identifier.issn0030-1299
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/200821
dc.description.abstractEnThe abiotic environment exerts strong effects on plant‐associated microbes, shaping their interactions with plants and resulting ecosystem processes. However, these abiotic effects on plant–microbe interactions are often highly specific and contingent on the abiotic driver or microbial group, requiring synthesis work describing general patterns and from this generate hypotheses and guide mechanistic work. To address this, we conducted a meta‐analysis of the effects of climate change‐related abiotic factors, namely warming, drought, and eCO 2 , on plant‐associated microbes distinguishing by microbial taxonomic or biological group (bacteria, fungi or virus) and the plant part where microbes are found or associated with (phyllosphere or rhizosphere). We found abiotic driver‐specific patterns, whereby drought significantly reduced microbial abundance, whereas warming and eCO 2 had no significant effects. In addition, these abiotic effects were contingent on the microbial taxonomic group, with fungi being negatively affected by drought but positively affected by warming (eCO 2 enrichment had no effect), whereas bacteria and viruses were not significantly affected by any factor. Likewise, rhizospheric microbes were negatively affected by drought but positively affected by warming (eCO 2 enrichment had no effect), whereas phyllospheric microbes were not significantly affected by any factor. Collectively, these findings point to important implications for global change research by highlighting contrasting effects of climate change‐related abiotic drivers on plant‐associated microbes and the contingency of such effects on microbe life histories and the nature of their interactions with plants.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherNordic Ecological Society
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
dc.subject.enclimate change
dc.subject.endrought
dc.subject.eneCO 2
dc.subject.enphyllosphere
dc.subject.enplant-associated microbes
dc.subject.enrhizosphere
dc.subject.enwarming
dc.title.enA meta‐analysis of the effects of climate change‐related abiotic factors on aboveground and belowground plant‐associated microbes
dc.typeArticle de revue
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/oik.10411
dc.subject.halSciences de l'environnement
bordeaux.journalOikos
bordeaux.volume2024
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBioGeCo (Biodiversité Gènes & Communautés) - UMR 1202*
bordeaux.issue7
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeaux
bordeaux.institutionINRAE
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierhal-04642970
hal.version1
hal.popularnon
hal.audienceInternationale
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//hal-04642970v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Oikos&rft.date=2024-03-04&rft.volume=2024&rft.issue=7&rft.eissn=0030-1299&rft.issn=0030-1299&rft.au=QUIROGA,%20Gabriela&CASTAGNEYROL,%20Bastien&ABDALA%E2%80%90ROBERTS,%20Luis&MOREIRA,%20Xoaqu%C3%ADn&rft.genre=article


Archivos en el ítem

ArchivosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay archivos asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem