Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Methods for comparing theoretical models parameterized with field data using biological criteria and Sobol analysis

hal.structure.identifierEcologie Systématique et Evolution [ESE]
dc.contributor.authorLUSARDI, Léo
hal.structure.identifierMathématiques et Informatique pour la Complexité et les Systèmes [MICS]
dc.contributor.authorANDRÉ, Eliot
hal.structure.identifierBiodiversité, Gènes & Communautés [BioGeCo]
hal.structure.identifierEcologie Systématique et Evolution [ESE]
dc.contributor.authorCASTAÑEDA, Irene
hal.structure.identifierMathématiques et Informatique pour la Complexité et les Systèmes [MICS]
dc.contributor.authorLEMLER, Sarah
hal.structure.identifierMathématiques et Informatique pour la Complexité et les Systèmes [MICS]
dc.contributor.authorLAFITTE, Pauline
hal.structure.identifierEcologie et Dynamique des Systèmes Anthropisés - UMR CNRS 7058 UPJV [EDYSAN]
hal.structure.identifierEcologie Systématique et Evolution [ESE]
dc.contributor.authorZARZOSO-LACOSTE, Diane
hal.structure.identifierEcologie Systématique et Evolution [ESE]
dc.contributor.authorBONNAUD, Elsa
dc.description.abstractEnPrey-predator models are frequently developed to investigate trophic webs and to predict the population dynamics of prey and predators. However, the parameters of these models are often implemented without empirical data and sometimes chosen arbitrarily. Furthermore, when the sensibility of the model to its parameter values is tested, only a few parameters are tested and different prey-predator models (in terms of predation function structure, for example) are rarely compared. Here, we propose a method to compare four prey-predator models for two populations and select the more biologically plausible one to model a simplified agricultural trophic system, including one predator compartment (the red fox Vulpes vulpes) and one prey group compartment (small mammals). These models are based on various Holling functional responses for the predation interaction and take the prey intrinsic growth into account through a Verhulst logistic function. Most parameters values (like attack rates or growth rates) were calculated from field data or based on literature review. Uncertainty quantification is a recent trend that has gained popularity in engineering fields. In this vein, we used Sobol indices to conduct parameter exploration around mean parameter values to investigate and compare the model dynamics responses. Our first results showed that under our assumptions, the two most relevant models for our study case are the saturated Holling I and II models. Furthermore, we were able to discriminate which were the most sensitive parameters in each model. These first encouraging results open the way for the next step, which will be to adapt this model construction to more complex prey-predator systems, with several predator and/or several prey compartments.
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject.enTrophic web
dc.subject.enprey predator models
dc.subject.enHolling functional responses
dc.subject.enparameter sensitivity
dc.title.enMethods for comparing theoretical models parameterized with field data using biological criteria and Sobol analysis
dc.typeDocument de travail - Pré-publication
dc.identifier.doi10.2139/ssrn.4659041
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Ecologie, Environnement/Ecosystèmes
hal.identifierhal-04324767
hal.version1
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//hal-04324767v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.au=LUSARDI,%20L%C3%A9o&ANDR%C3%89,%20Eliot&CASTA%C3%91EDA,%20Irene&LEMLER,%20Sarah&LAFITTE,%20Pauline&rft.genre=preprint


Archivos en el ítem

ArchivosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay archivos asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem