Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Organic farming at local and landscape scales fosters biological pest control in vineyards

hal.structure.identifierBiodiversité, Gènes & Communautés [BioGeCo]
dc.contributor.authorMUNERET, Lucile
hal.structure.identifierSanté et agroécologie du vignoble [UMR SAVE]
dc.contributor.authorAURIOL, Arthur
hal.structure.identifierSanté et agroécologie du vignoble [UMR SAVE]
dc.contributor.authorTHIERY, Denis
hal.structure.identifierSanté et agroécologie du vignoble [UMR SAVE]
dc.contributor.authorRUSCH, Adrien
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-08T12:35:13Z
dc.date.available2024-04-08T12:35:13Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1051-0761
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/197303
dc.description.abstractEnWhile organic farming practices, which are often promoted as models of ecological intensification, generally enhance biodiversity, their effects on the delivery of ecosystem services, such as biological pest control, are still unknown. Here, using a multi-scale hierarchical design in southwestern France, we examined the effects of organic farming and seminatural habitats at the local and landscape scales on biological control services of three pests, including weeds and insects, in 42 vineyards. Organic farming at the local and landscape scales was beneficial to the mean and temporal stability of biological control services, while the proportion of seminatural habitats in the landscape reduced the level of biological pest control potential. The effects of organic farming and seminatural habitats across spatial scales varied with the type of prey considered and with time. Egg moth removal rates were higher in fields under organic management compared to conventional management while weed seed removal rates increased with the proportion of organic farming in the landscape. Larval removal rates as well as seed removal rates were always more stable within time in organic fields than in conventional fields. Moreover, independently of farming system type, local variables describing the agricultural management intensity, such as pesticide use or crop productivity, were also found to be important variables explaining levels of biological control services. Pesticide use tended to reduce biological control potential, while crop productivity was associated with contrasting biological control responses depending on the pest type. Our study demonstrates the need to target multiple spatial scales and to consider farming practices, as well as the proportion of seminatural habitats, to design functional landscapes that optimize biological pest control services.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEcological Society of America
dc.subjectpesticide
dc.subjectseminatural habitats
dc.subject.enecosystem services
dc.subject.enlandscape scale
dc.subject.ennatural pest control
dc.subject.enorganic farming
dc.subject.envineyards
dc.subject.enyield
dc.title.enOrganic farming at local and landscape scales fosters biological pest control in vineyards
dc.typeArticle de revue
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/eap.1818
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]
dc.subject.halSciences de l'environnement
bordeaux.journalEcological Applications
bordeaux.page1-15
bordeaux.volume29
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesSanté et Agro-Ecologie du Vignoble (SAVE) - UMR 1065*
bordeaux.issue1
bordeaux.institutionBordeaux Sciences Agro
bordeaux.institutionINRAE
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierhal-02619292
hal.version1
hal.popularnon
hal.audienceInternationale
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//hal-02619292v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20Applications&rft.date=2019&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1-15&rft.epage=1-15&rft.eissn=1051-0761&rft.issn=1051-0761&rft.au=MUNERET,%20Lucile&AURIOL,%20Arthur&THIERY,%20Denis&RUSCH,%20Adrien&rft.genre=article


Archivos en el ítem

ArchivosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay archivos asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem