Afficher la notice abrégée

hal.structure.identifierInteractions Sol Plante Atmosphère [UMR ISPA]
dc.contributor.authorMOREL, Christian
hal.structure.identifierPlantes et systèmes de culture horticoles [PSH]
dc.contributor.authorPLÉNET, Daniel
hal.structure.identifierInteractions Sol Plante Atmosphère [UMR ISPA]
dc.contributor.authorMOLLIER, Alain
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-08T11:53:08Z
dc.date.available2024-04-08T11:53:08Z
dc.date.issued2021-01
dc.identifier.issn1161-0301
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/195517
dc.description.abstractEnThe sustainable management of phosphorus (P) fertility in agroecosystems depends on either soil- or plant-based diagnosis methods. Our overall objective was to determine the relationship between the P nutrition index based on a critical P dilution of maize (Zea mays. L.) and indicators of the soil P supply assessed using either a process-based approach or the common chemical extraction of the Olsen’ method. Long-term field experiments on mineral P fertilization, conducted at four sites with contrasting soil types representative of the main types of cropped soils in France, were selected to have deficient to excessive plant-available soil P. Three annual rates of superphosphate including no-P (P0) and about one (P1) and two (P2) times the annual P exported in harvests were studied, while the N and K supply was non-limiting. The shoot biomass (W, Mg DM ha−1) and its P concentration (Pmaize, g P kg−1 DM) were determined at 5–8 dates during the plant cycle after more or less two decades of P applications. Plant-available soil P in the ploughed layer was assessed by a functional and process-based approach that consists in determining together orthophosphate ions (oPions) concentration (CP, mg P L−1), and the oPions amount (Qw) in solution, and the amounts of diffusive oPions bound to soils (Pr, mg P kg−1 soil) that equilibrates the solution over time (t in minutes). We also assessed plant-available soil P by the Olsen’ extraction (Olsen-P). Shoot biomass significantly decreased for the P0 treatment while there was no significant differences between the P1 and P2 treatments. The Pmaize decreased as W increased. The criticalPmaize curve, the minimum Pmaize required to achieve maximum growth, was estimated using all data of the P1 treatment from the four sites: 3.66 × W−0.238 (r² = 0.61 for 78 observations). At maturity, the P nutritional index (PNI), calculated as the measured Pmaize divided by the criticalPmaize, ranged from 53 % to 92 % for the P0 treatment and from 94 % to 128 % for the P1 and P2 treatments. The CP values ranged from 0.04 to 2.25 mg P L−1. The Pr values were described accurately by: Pr = v × CPw × tp for t <400 min with (v, w, p) highly different across soils types. Calibrations of PNI to CP or to Olsen-P were both soil-specific. The new result brought by this study was that a unique calibration curve for all sites was obtained for PNI vs (Qw + Pr) considering a period of resupplying soil solution oPions of about one day. All points fell on the same regression line suggesting that this soil- and plant-based methods of diagnossis would both equally effective. This result provides new evidence of much better relevance and reliability of the process-based assessment rather than chemical extraction to adequately estimate the fraction of soil P that contributes to plant nutrition. The plant available soil P stock was better evaluated by the process-based approach because oPions buffering capacity of soils was accounted for. Consequently, the relationship between plant and soil indicators was highly improved.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subject.enCropland
dc.subject.enCritical plant P concentration
dc.subject.enP nutritional index
dc.subject.enPNI
dc.subject.enDiagnosis
dc.subject.enIons orthophosphates
dc.subject.enMaize
dc.subject.enOlsen extraction
dc.subject.enSoil-Solution diffusion
dc.subject.enLong term field
dc.subject.enExperiment
dc.title.enCalibration of maize phosphorus status by plant-available soil P assessed by common and process-based approaches. Is it soil-specific or not?
dc.typeArticle de revue
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eja.2020.126174
dc.subject.halSciences de l'environnement
bordeaux.journalEuropean Journal of Agronomy
bordeaux.page1-12
bordeaux.volume122
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesInteractions Soil Plant Atmosphere (ISPA) - UMR 1391*
bordeaux.institutionBordeaux Sciences Agro
bordeaux.institutionINRAE
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierhal-02962163
hal.version1
hal.popularnon
hal.audienceInternationale
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//hal-02962163v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&amp;rft.jtitle=European%20Journal%20of%20Agronomy&amp;rft.date=2021-01&amp;rft.volume=122&amp;rft.spage=1-12&amp;rft.epage=1-12&amp;rft.eissn=1161-0301&amp;rft.issn=1161-0301&amp;rft.au=MOREL,%20Christian&amp;PL%C3%89NET,%20Daniel&amp;MOLLIER,%20Alain&amp;rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée