Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

hal.structure.identifierGroupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée [GREThA]
dc.contributor.authorDOYEN, Luc
hal.structure.identifierInternational Center for Tropical Agriculture [Colombie] [CIAT]
dc.contributor.authorBÉNÉ, Christophe
hal.structure.identifierUnité Sciences et Technologies Halieutiques [STH]
dc.contributor.authorBERTIGNAC, Michel
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire Ecologie, Evolution, Interactions des Systèmes amazoniens [LEEISA]
dc.contributor.authorBLANCHARD, Fabian
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire Ecologie, Evolution, Interactions des Systèmes amazoniens [LEEISA]
dc.contributor.authorCISSE, Abdoul Ahad
hal.structure.identifierOceans and Atmosphere Flagship [Brisbane]
dc.contributor.authorDICHMONT, Catherine
hal.structure.identifierAménagement des Usages des Ressources et des Espaces marins et littoraux - Centre de droit et d'économie de la mer [AMURE]
dc.contributor.authorGOURGUET, Sophie
hal.structure.identifierAménagement des Usages des Ressources et des Espaces marins et littoraux - Centre de droit et d'économie de la mer [AMURE]
dc.contributor.authorGUYADER, Olivier
hal.structure.identifierCentre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive [CEFE]
dc.contributor.authorHARDY, Pierre-Yves
hal.structure.identifierUniversity of Tasmania [Hobart, Australia] [UTAS]
dc.contributor.authorJENNINGS, Sarah
hal.structure.identifierCSIRO Marine and Atmosphere Research [Hobart]
dc.contributor.authorLITTLE, Lorne Richard
hal.structure.identifierAménagement des Usages des Ressources et des Espaces marins et littoraux - Centre de droit et d'économie de la mer [AMURE]
dc.contributor.authorMACHER, Claire
hal.structure.identifierWorldFish
hal.structure.identifierARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies [CoralCoE]
dc.contributor.authorMILLS, David Jonathan
hal.structure.identifierInstitut de Mathématiques de Bordeaux [IMB]
dc.contributor.authorNOUSSAIR, Ahmed
hal.structure.identifierOceans and Atmosphere Flagship [Brisbane]
dc.contributor.authorPASCOE, Sean
hal.structure.identifierGroupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée [GREThA]
dc.contributor.authorPEREAU, Jean Christophe
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire Ecologie, Evolution, Interactions des Systèmes amazoniens [LEEISA]
dc.contributor.authorSANZ, Nicolas
hal.structure.identifierWorldFish
dc.contributor.authorSCHWARZ, Anne-Maree
hal.structure.identifierCSIRO Marine and Atmosphere Research [Hobart]
dc.contributor.authorSMITH, Tony
hal.structure.identifierAménagement des Usages des Ressources et des Espaces marins et littoraux - Centre de droit et d'économie de la mer [AMURE]
dc.contributor.authorTHÉBAUD, Olivier
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-04T02:31:40Z
dc.date.available2024-04-04T02:31:40Z
dc.date.issued2017-11
dc.identifier.issn1467-2960
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/190325
dc.description.abstractEnReconciling food security, economic development and biodiversity conservation is a key challenge, especially in the face of the demographic transition characterizing many countries in the world. Fisheries and marine ecosystems constitute a difficult application of this bio‐economic challenge. Many experts and scientists advocate an ecosystem approach to manage marine socio‐ecosystems for their sustainability and resilience. However, the ways by which to operationalize ecosystem‐based fisheries management (EBFM) remain poorly specified. We propose a specific methodological framework—viability modelling—to do so. We show how viability modelling can be applied using four contrasted case‐studies: two small‐scale fisheries in South America and Pacific and two larger‐scale fisheries in Europe and Australia. The four fisheries are analysed using the same modelling framework, structured around a set of common methods, indicators and scenarios. The calibrated models are dynamic, multispecies and multifleet and account for various sources of uncertainty. A multicriteria evaluation is used to assess the scenarios’ outcomes over a long time horizon with different constraints based on ecological, social and economic reference points. Results show to what extent the bio‐economic and ecosystem risks associated with the adoption of status quo strategies are relatively high and challenge the implementation of EBFM. In contrast, strategies called ecoviability or co‐viability strategies, that aim at satisfying the viability constraints, reduce significantly these ecological and economic risks and promote EBFM. The gains associated with those ecoviability strategies, however, decrease with the intensity of regulations imposed on these fisheries.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.subject.enFisheries
dc.subject.enMarine ecosystems
dc.subject.enBio‐economic challenge
dc.subject.enEcosystem‐based fisheries management
dc.subject.enSmall‐scale fisheries
dc.subject.enLarge‐scale fisheries
dc.subject.enMulticriteria evaluation
dc.subject.enEcoviability
dc.title.enEcoviability for ecosystem-based fisheries management
dc.typeArticle de revue
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/faf.12224
dc.subject.halSciences de l'environnement
bordeaux.journalFish and Fisheries
bordeaux.page1056-1072
bordeaux.volume18
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesInstitut de Mathématiques de Bordeaux (IMB) - UMR 5251*
bordeaux.issue6
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeaux
bordeaux.institutionBordeaux INP
bordeaux.institutionCNRS
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierhal-01940469
hal.version1
hal.popularnon
hal.audienceInternationale
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//hal-01940469v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Fish%20and%20Fisheries&rft.date=2017-11&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1056-1072&rft.epage=1056-1072&rft.eissn=1467-2960&rft.issn=1467-2960&rft.au=DOYEN,%20Luc&B%C3%89N%C3%89,%20Christophe&BERTIGNAC,%20Michel&BLANCHARD,%20Fabian&CISSE,%20Abdoul%20Ahad&rft.genre=article


Archivos en el ítem

ArchivosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay archivos asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem