Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierEnvironnements et Paléoenvironnements OCéaniques [EPOC]
dc.contributor.authorNEMER, David
dc.contributor.authorLIANCOURT, Pierre
dc.contributor.authorDELERUE, Florian
hal.structure.identifierEnvironnements et Paléoenvironnements OCéaniques [EPOC]
dc.contributor.authorRANDE, Hugo
hal.structure.identifierEnvironnements et Paléoenvironnements OCéaniques [EPOC]
dc.contributor.authorMICHALET, Richard
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-26T10:41:35Z
dc.date.available2024-02-26T10:41:35Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-10
dc.identifier.issn0022-0477en_US
dc.identifier.urioai:crossref.org:10.1111/1365-2745.13785
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/188432
dc.description.abstractEnAbstract Both chemical and physical properties of soils have been used for two centuries for explaining differences in species composition and diversity between plant communities from calcareous and siliceous soils. Here, we examine the prediction from the ‘physical hypothesis’, which proposes that species from siliceous soils are absent from calcareous soils because of high drought stress, while species from calcareous soils are absent from siliceous soils because of high competition due to higher water availability. This hypothesis therefore predicts a trade‐off between stress tolerance and competitive response that allows calcareous and siliceous species to dominate their respective communities. There has been no attempt to experimentally assess these predictions. We cross‐transplanted with and without neighbours using a removal experiment, two dominant species from calcareous soils (Bromus erectus and Brachypodium sylvaticum) and two species from siliceous soils (Pseudarrhenatherum longifolium and Deschampsia flexuosa) in herbaceous communities from the two soils types. We repeated the experiment 4 years, taking advantage of inter‐annual climatic variability to test the interplay between year quality (dry vs. wet years) and soil types on survival responses with and without neighbours. We quantified species stress tolerances, their competitive responses and the competitive effect of the two community types. In the absence of neighbours, species from siliceous soils had much lower survival than species from calcareous soils during dry years, in particular on calcareous soils. It indicates a lower stress tolerance of siliceous species and a higher level of stress occurring on calcareous soils. Competition strongly reduced the survival of calcareous but not siliceous species, indicating a greater competitive response of the latter and competition was more important on siliceous soils than on calcareous soils during wet years. However, we found that species stress tolerances were more important than competitive effect of neighbours in driving differences in species composition. Synthesis. The contrasting responses found for dominant species from calcareous and siliceous soils support the trade‐off between stress tolerance and competitive response proposed by the physical hypothesis. Our results bring additional evidence that differences in water availability and stress between the two soil types are driving species responses to bedrock types.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.sourcecrossref
dc.subject.encalcareous soils
dc.subject.enclimate variability
dc.subject.encompetitive effects
dc.subject.encompetitive responses
dc.subject.endrought stress
dc.subject.ensiliceous soils
dc.subject.enStress tolerance
dc.title.enSpecies stress tolerance and community competitive effects drive differences in species composition between calcareous and siliceous plant communities
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1365-2745.13785en_US
dc.subject.halSciences de l'environnementen_US
bordeaux.journalJournal of Ecologyen_US
bordeaux.page4132-4142en_US
bordeaux.volume109en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesEPOC : Environnements et Paléoenvironnements Océaniques et Continentaux - UMR 5805en_US
bordeaux.issue12en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionCNRSen_US
bordeaux.teamECOBIOCen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.import.sourcedissemin
hal.identifierhal-04477410
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2024-02-26T10:41:37Z
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exporttrue
workflow.import.sourcedissemin
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Ecology&rft.date=2021-10-10&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=4132-4142&rft.epage=4132-4142&rft.eissn=0022-0477&rft.issn=0022-0477&rft.au=NEMER,%20David&LIANCOURT,%20Pierre&DELERUE,%20Florian&RANDE,%20Hugo&MICHALET,%20Richard&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée