Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorLOSAPIO, Gianalberto
dc.contributor.authorSCHMID, Bernhard
dc.contributor.authorBASCOMPTE, Jordi
hal.structure.identifierEnvironnements et Paléoenvironnements OCéaniques [EPOC]
dc.contributor.authorMICHALET, Richard
dc.contributor.authorCERRETTI, Pierfilippo
dc.contributor.authorGERMANN, Christoph
dc.contributor.authorHAENNI, Jean-Paul
dc.contributor.authorNEUMEYER, Rainer
dc.contributor.authorORTIZ-SANCHEZ, Francisco Javier
dc.contributor.authorPONT, Adrian C.
dc.contributor.authorROUSSE, Pascal
dc.contributor.authorSCHMID, Jurg
dc.contributor.authorSOMMAGGIO, Daniele
dc.contributor.authorSCHOB, Christian
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-22T09:07:35Z
dc.date.available2023-11-22T09:07:35Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-01
dc.identifier.issn0012-9658en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/186045
dc.description.abstractEnPlants acting as ecosystem engineers create habitats and facilitate biodiversity maintenance within plant communities. Furthermore, biodiversity research has demonstrated that plant diversity enhances the productivity and functioning of ecosystems. However, these two fields of research developed in parallel and independent from one another, with the consequence that little is known about the role of ecosystem engineers in the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning across trophic levels. Here, we present an experimental framework to study this relationship. We combine facilitation by plants acting as ecosystem engineers with plant–insect interaction analysis and variance partitioning of biodiversity effects. We present a case-study experiment in which facilitation by a cushion-plant species and a dwarf-shrub species as ecosystem engineers increases positive effects of plant functional diversity (ecosystem engineers and associated plants) on ecosystem functioning (flower visitation rate). The experiment, conducted in the field during a single alpine flowering season, included the following treatments: (1) removal of plant species associated with ecosystem engineers, (2) exclusion (covering) of ecosystem engineer flowers, and (3) control, i.e., natural patches of ecosystem engineers and associated plant species. We found both positive and negative associational effects between plants depending on ecosystem engineer identity, indicating both pollination facilitation and interference. In both cases, patches supported by ecosystem engineers increased phylogenetic and functional diversity of flower visitors. Furthermore, complementarity effects between engineers and associated plants were positive for flower visitation rates. Our study reveals that plant facilitation can enhance the strength of biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships, with complementarity between plants for attracting more and diverse flower visitors being the likely driver. A potential mechanism is that synergy and complementarity between engineers and associated plants increase attractiveness for shared visitors and widen pollination niches. In synthesis, facilitation among plants can scale up to a full network, supporting ecosystem functioning both directly via microhabitat amelioration and indirectly via diversity effects.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.subject.enAnimals
dc.subject.enBiodiversity
dc.subject.enComplementarity
dc.subject.enEcosystem
dc.subject.enEcosystem Engineering
dc.subject.enEcosystem Function
dc.subject.enEcosystem Structure
dc.subject.enEnvironmental Impact Assessment
dc.subject.enExperimental Study
dc.subject.enFlower Visiting
dc.subject.enHexapoda
dc.subject.enNiche
dc.subject.enPhylogenetics
dc.subject.enPhylogeny
dc.subject.enPlant Community
dc.subject.enPlant-Insect Interaction
dc.subject.enPlants
dc.subject.enPollination
dc.subject.enTrophic Level
dc.title.enAn experimental approach to assessing the impact of ecosystem engineers on biodiversity and ecosystem functions
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ecy.3243en_US
dc.subject.halSciences de l'environnementen_US
bordeaux.journalEcologyen_US
bordeaux.volume102en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesEPOC : Environnements et Paléoenvironnements Océaniques et Continentaux - UMR 5805en_US
bordeaux.issue2en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionCNRSen_US
bordeaux.teamECOBIOCen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-04299296
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2023-11-22T09:07:38Z
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exporttrue
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Ecology&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=2&rft.eissn=0012-9658&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.au=LOSAPIO,%20Gianalberto&SCHMID,%20Bernhard&BASCOMPTE,%20Jordi&MICHALET,%20Richard&CERRETTI,%20Pierfilippo&rft.genre=article


Archivos en el ítem

ArchivosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay archivos asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem