Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorGALVIN, Angeline
dc.contributor.authorSOUBEYRAN, Pierre
dc.contributor.authorBRAIN, Etienne
dc.contributor.authorCHEUNG, Kwok-Leung
dc.contributor.authorHAMAKER, Marije E
dc.contributor.authorKANESVARAN, Ravindran
dc.contributor.authorMAUER, Murielle
dc.contributor.authorMOHILE, Supriya
dc.contributor.authorMONTRONI, Isacco
dc.contributor.authorPUTS, Martine
dc.contributor.authorROSTOFT, Siri
dc.contributor.authorWILDIERS, Hans
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorMATHOULIN-PELISSIER, Simone
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorBELLERA, Carine
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-06T17:00:26Z
dc.date.available2023-11-06T17:00:26Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-05
dc.identifier.issn1879-4076en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/184647
dc.description.abstractEnAs older adults with cancer are underrepresented in randomized clinical trials (RCT), there is limited evidence on which to rely for treatment decisions for this population. Commonly used RCT endpoints for the assessment of treatment efficacy are more often tumor-centered (e.g., progression-free survival). These endpoints may not be as relevant for the older patients who present more often with comorbidities, non-cancer-related deaths, and treatment toxicity. Moreover, their expectation and preferences are likely to differ from younger adults. The DATECAN-ELDERLY initiative combines a broad expertise, in geriatric oncology and clinical research, with interest in cancer RCT that include older patients with cancer. In order to guide researchers and clinicians coordinating cancer RCT involving older patients with cancer, the experts reviewed the literature on relevant domains to assess using patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and patient-related outcomes, as well as available tools related to these domains. Domains considered relevant by the panel of experts when assessing treatment efficacy in RCT for older patients with cancer included functional autonomy, cognition, depression and nutrition. These were based on published guidelines from international societies and from regulatory authorities as well as minimum datasets recommended to collect in RCT including older adults with cancer. In addition, health-related quality of life, patients' symptoms, and satisfaction were also considered by the panel. With regards to tools for the assessment of these domains, we highlighted that each tool has its own strengths and limitations, and very few had been validated in older adults with cancer. Further studies are thus needed to validate these tools in this specific population and define the minimum clinically important difference to use when developing RCTs in this population. The selection of the most relevant tool should thus be guided by the RCT research question, together with the specific properties of the tool.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subject.enAged
dc.subject.enCognition
dc.subject.enDepression
dc.subject.enFunctional autonomy
dc.subject.enHealth-related quality of life
dc.subject.enNeoplasms
dc.subject.enNutrition
dc.subject.enPatient satisfaction
dc.subject.enPatient-related outcome
dc.subject.enPatient-reported outcome
dc.subject.enToxicity
dc.title.enAssessing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-related outcomes in randomized cancer clinical trials for older adults: Results of DATECAN-ELDERLY initiative
dc.title.alternativeJ Geriatr Oncolen_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101611en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed37679204en_US
bordeaux.journalJournal of Geriatric Oncologyen_US
bordeaux.page101611en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionINSERMen_US
bordeaux.teamEPICENEen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.identifier.funderIDFondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le Canceren_US
bordeaux.identifier.funderIDLigue Contre le Canceren_US
bordeaux.identifier.funderIDFondation Bergoniéen_US
bordeaux.import.sourcepubmed
hal.identifierhal-04272690
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2023-11-06T17:00:31Z
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exporttrue
workflow.import.sourcepubmed
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geriatric%20Oncology&rft.date=2023-09-05&rft.spage=101611&rft.epage=101611&rft.eissn=1879-4076&rft.issn=1879-4076&rft.au=GALVIN,%20Angeline&SOUBEYRAN,%20Pierre&BRAIN,%20Etienne&CHEUNG,%20Kwok-Leung&HAMAKER,%20Marije%20E&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée