Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux Sciences Economiques [BSE]
dc.contributor.authorGUYOT, Julien
dc.contributor.authorRAO, Akhil
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux Sciences Economiques [BSE]
dc.contributor.authorROUILLON, Sebastien
IDREF: 149491913
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-24T07:33:49Z
dc.date.available2023-10-24T07:33:49Z
dc.date.issued2023-10-16
dc.identifier.issn0027-8424en_US
dc.identifier.urioai:crossref.org:10.1073/pnas.2221343120
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/184506
dc.description.abstractEnOrbital space enables many essential services, such as weather forecasting, global communication, navigation, Earth observation for environmental and agricultural management, and national security applications. Orbit use is increasingly defined by firms launching coordinated fleets—“constellations”—of satellites into low-Earth orbit. These firms operate in markets with few or no competitors, such as the market for broadband internet provision to rural areas. How will oligopolistic competition shape the allocation of orbital space? We analyze orbital-use patterns and economic welfare when two profit-maximizing firms operate satellite constellations with sophisticated collision avoidance systems. We compare this duopoly equilibrium to public utility constellations designed and regulated to maximize economic welfare from orbit use. We show that imperfect competition reduces economic welfare from orbit use by up to 12%—$1.1 billion USD—per year and distorts the allocation of orbital space. The nature of the distortion depends on the magnitude of constellation-related environmental damages. When damages are low, economic welfare is maximized by larger-than-equilibrium constellations. When damages are high, economic welfare is maximized by smaller-than-equilibrium constellations. Between the growing commercial and national interests in outer space and the importance of low-Earth orbit to space exploration, orbit-use management is likely to be a fruitful and policy-relevant area for economic research. We conclude with a discussion of future research directions in orbit-use management relevant to policymakers around the world.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.sourcecrossref
dc.subjectGame theory
dc.subject.enSpace economics
dc.subject.enSatellites
dc.subject.enOligopoly
dc.subject.enCommon-pool resources
dc.title.enOligopoly competition between satellite constellations will reduce economic welfare from orbit use
dc.title.alternativePNASen_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1073/pnas.2221343120en_US
dc.subject.halSciences de l'Homme et Société/Economies et financesen_US
bordeaux.journalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of Americaen_US
bordeaux.page1-10en_US
bordeaux.volume120en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Sciences Economiques / Bordeaux School of Economics (BSE) - UMR 6060en_US
bordeaux.issue43en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionCNRSen_US
bordeaux.institutionINRAEen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.import.sourcedissemin
hal.identifierhal-04255554
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2023-10-24T07:33:51Z
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exporttrue
workflow.import.sourcedissemin
dc.rights.ccCC BYen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20National%20Academy%20of%20Sciences%20of%20the%20United%20States%20of%20America&rft.date=2023-10-16&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=43&rft.spage=1-10&rft.epage=1-10&rft.eissn=0027-8424&rft.issn=0027-8424&rft.au=GUYOT,%20Julien&RAO,%20Akhil&ROUILLON,%20Sebastien&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée