Afficher la notice abrégée

Revegetation through seeding or planting: A worldwide systematic map

hal.structure.identifierUniversidad de Granada = University of Granada [UGR]
hal.structure.identifierBiodiversité, Gènes & Communautés [BioGeCo]
dc.contributor.authorLÁZARO-GONZÁLEZ, Alba
hal.structure.identifierUniversidad Complutense de Madrid = Complutense University of Madrid [Madrid] [UCM]
dc.contributor.authorANDIVIA, Enrique
hal.structure.identifierBiodiversité, Gènes & Communautés [BioGeCo]
dc.contributor.authorHAMPE, Arndt
hal.structure.identifierSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences = Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet [SLU]
hal.structure.identifierUmeå University = Umeå Universitet
dc.contributor.authorHASEGAWA, Shun
hal.structure.identifierUniversità degli studi di Torino = University of Turin [UNITO]
dc.contributor.authorMARZANO, Raffaella
hal.structure.identifierUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid [UAM]
dc.contributor.authorSANTOS, Ana M.C.
hal.structure.identifierUniversidad de Granada = University of Granada [UGR]
dc.contributor.authorCASTRO, Jorge
hal.structure.identifierUniversidad de Granada = University of Granada [UGR]
dc.contributor.authorLEVERKUS, Alexandro
dc.date.issued2023-07
dc.identifier.issn0301-4797
dc.description.abstractEnRoughly 2 billion ha of land are degraded and in need of ecological restoration worldwide. Active restoration frequently involves revegetation, which leads to the dilemma of whether to conduct direct seeding or to plant nursery-grown seedlings. The choice of revegetation method can regulate plant survival and performance, with economic implications that ultimately feed back to our capacity to conduct restoration. We followed a peerreviewed protocol to develop a systematic map that collates, describes and catalogues the available studies on how seeding compares to planting in achieving restoration targets. We compiled a database with the characteristics of all retrieved studies, which can be searched to identify studies of particular locations and habitats, objectives of restoration, plant material, technical aspects, and outcomes measured. The search was made in eight languages and retrieved 3355 publications, of which 178 were retained. The systematic map identifies research gaps, such as a lack of studies in the global South, in tropical rainforests, and covering a long time period, which represent opportunities to expand field-based research. Additionally, many studies overlooked reporting on important technical aspects such as seed provenance and nursery cultivation methods, and others such as watering or seedling protection were more frequently applied for planting than for seeding, which limits our capacity to learn from past research. Most studies measured outcomes related to the target plants but avoided measuring general restoration outcomes or economic aspects. This represents a relevant gap in research, as the choice of revegetation method is greatly based on economic aspects and the achievement of restoration goals goes beyond the establishment of plants. Finally, we identified a substantial volume of studies conducted in temperate regions and over short periods (0-5 y). This research cluster calls for a future in-depth synthesis, potentially through meta-analysis, to reveal the overall balance between seeding and planting and assess whether the response to this question is mediated by species traits, environmental characteristics, or technical aspects. Besides identifying research clusters and gaps, the systematic map database allows managers to find the most relevant scientific literature on the appropriateness of seeding vs. planting for particular conditions, such as certain species or habitats.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
dc.subject.enReforestation
dc.subject.enSowing
dc.subject.enSeedling
dc.subject.enNursery
dc.subject.enForestry
dc.subject.enUN Decade on ecosystem restoration
dc.title.enRevegetation through seeding or planting: A worldwide systematic map
dc.typeArticle de revue
dc.typeArticle de synthèse
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117713
dc.subject.halSciences de l'environnement
bordeaux.journalJournal of Environmental Management
bordeaux.page117713
bordeaux.volume337
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierhal-04103320
hal.version1
hal.popularnon
hal.audienceInternationale
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//hal-04103320v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Environmental%20Management&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=337&rft.spage=117713&rft.epage=117713&rft.eissn=0301-4797&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.au=L%C3%81ZARO-GONZ%C3%81LEZ,%20Alba&ANDIVIA,%20Enrique&HAMPE,%20Arndt&HASEGAWA,%20Shun&MARZANO,%20Raffaella&rft.genre=article&unknown


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée