Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorPOISEUIL, Marie
dc.contributor.authorMOUTEL, Gregoire
dc.contributor.authorCOSSON, Mathilde
dc.contributor.authorQUERTIER, Marie-Christine
dc.contributor.authorDUCHANGE, Nathalie
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorDARQUY, Silviane
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-20T08:10:33Z
dc.date.available2023-03-20T08:10:33Z
dc.date.issued2023-02-13
dc.identifier.issn1473-5709 (Electronic) 0959-8278 (Linking)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/172351
dc.description.abstractEnBACKGROUND: Today, women 50 years of age are offered three types of cancer screening in France. However, participation is not optimal. The aim was to describe (1) participation in organised breast cancer screening (OS) of women aged 56 years old, and the influence of this participation on colorectal and cervical cancer screening, (2) the reasons for non-participation in breast cancer OS, and (3) the reasons for screening before age 50. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 56-year-old women in four French departments to identify their participation behaviour in three breast cancer OS invitations and their reasons for non-participation. Three groups were determined according to the number of participations in breast cancer OS (3, 1-2 and 0). We described the quantitative responses and grouped the qualitative responses thematically. RESULTS: A total of 4634 women responded to the questionnaire. Seventy-six percent had undergone all three breast cancer OS, 16% irregular and 7% non-participant. Among women who irregularly perform breast cancer OS, 50.5% also irregularly perform colorectal cancer OS. Women who participated in all three invitations for the breast cancer OS performed more smear tests than women in the other groups. Many of the irregular participants or non-participants underwent opportunistic screening, often initiated before the age of 50. The reasons for non-participation in breast cancer OS were mainly medical or participation in opportunistic screening. CONCLUSION: There is no fundamental opposition to participation in breast cancer screening. However, it remains of the utmost importance that women should be better informed about OS and its benefits.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.subject.enBreast cancer
dc.subject.enCancer screening
dc.subject.enWomen’s attendance
dc.subject.enQuestionnaire
dc.title.enParticipation in breast cancer screening and its influence on other cancer screening invitations: study in women aged 56 years old in four French departments
dc.title.alternativeEur J Cancer Preven_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/cej.0000000000000777en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed36779309en_US
bordeaux.journalEuropean Journal of Cancer Preventionen_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionINSERMen_US
bordeaux.teamEPICENE_BPHen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-04036867
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2023-03-20T08:10:37Z
hal.exporttrue
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=European%20Journal%20of%20Cancer%20Prevention&rft.date=2023-02-13&rft.eissn=1473-5709%20(Electronic)%200959-8278%20(Linking)&rft.issn=1473-5709%20(Electronic)%200959-8278%20(Linking)&rft.au=POISEUIL,%20Marie&MOUTEL,%20Gregoire&COSSON,%20Mathilde&QUERTIER,%20Marie-Christine&DUCHANGE,%20Nathalie&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée