Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorSABAPATHY, K.
dc.contributor.authorBALZER, L.
dc.contributor.authorLARMARANGE, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorBLOCK, L.
dc.contributor.authorFLOYD, S.
dc.contributor.authorIWUJI, Collins
dc.contributor.authorWIRTH, K.
dc.contributor.authorAYLES, H.
dc.contributor.authorFIDLER, S.
dc.contributor.authorKAMYA, M.
dc.contributor.authorPETERSEN, Morten
dc.contributor.authorHAVLIR, D.
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
hal.structure.identifierGlobal Health in the Global South [GHiGS]
dc.contributor.authorDABIS, Francois
dc.contributor.authorMOORE, Jason
dc.contributor.authorHAYES, R.
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-23T09:30:54Z
dc.date.available2023-02-23T09:30:54Z
dc.date.issued2022-12-13
dc.identifier.issn1471-2458 (Electronic) 1471-2458 (Linking)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/172071
dc.description.abstractEnBackground: Four large community-randomized trials examining universal testing and treatment (UTT) to reduce HIV transmission were conducted between 2012-2018 in Botswana, Kenya, Uganda, Zambia and South Africa. In 2014, the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets were adopted as a useful metric to monitor coverage. We systematically review I the approaches used by the trials to measure intervention delivery, and estimate coverage against the 90-90-90 targets. We aim to provide in-depth understanding of the background contexts and complexities that affect estimation of population-level coverage related to the 90-90-90 targets. Methods: Estimates were based predominantly on "process" data obtained during delivery of the interventions which included a combination of home-based and community-based services. Cascade coverage data included routine electronic health records, self-reported data, survey data, and active ascertainment of HIV viral load measurements in the field. Results: The estimated total adult populations of trial intervention communities included in this study ranged from 4,290 (TasP) to 142,250 (Zambian PopART Arm-B). The estimated total numbers of PLHIV ranged from 1,283 (TasP) to 20,541 (Zambian PopART Arm-B). By the end of intervention delivery, the first-90 target (knowledge of HIV status among all PLHIV) was met by all the trials (89.2%-94.0%). Three of the four trials also achieved the second- and third-90 targets, and viral suppression in BCPP and SEARCH exceeded the UNAIDS target of 73%, while viral suppression in the Zambian PopART Arm-A and B communities was within a small margin (similar to 3%) of the target. Conclusions: All four UTT trials aimed to implement wide-scale testing and treatment for HIV prevention at population level and showed substantial increases in testing and treatment for HIV in the intervention communities. This study has not uncovered any one estimation approach which is superior, rather that several approaches are available and researchers or policy makers seeking to measure coverage should reflect on background contexts and complexities that affect estimation of population-level coverage in their specific settings.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subject.enHIV
dc.subject.enAntiretroviral treatment
dc.subject.enUniversal Testing and Treatment
dc.subject.enTreatment as Prevention
dc.subject.enUNAIDS 90-90-90
dc.title.enAchieving the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets: a comparative analysis of four large community randomised trials delivering universal testing and treatment to reduce HIV transmission in sub-Saharan Africa
dc.title.alternativeBmc Public Healthen_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12889-022-14713-5en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed36514036en_US
bordeaux.journalBMC Public Healthen_US
bordeaux.volume22en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219en_US
bordeaux.issue1en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionINSERMen_US
bordeaux.teamGHIGS_BPHen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.exportfalse
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=BMC%20Public%20Health&rft.date=2022-12-13&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.eissn=1471-2458%20(Electronic)%201471-2458%20(Linking)&rft.issn=1471-2458%20(Electronic)%201471-2458%20(Linking)&rft.au=SABAPATHY,%20K.&BALZER,%20L.&LARMARANGE,%20Joseph&BLOCK,%20L.&FLOYD,%20S.&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée