Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health
dc.contributor.authorHANCOCK, Laura M.
hal.structure.identifierUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health
dc.contributor.authorHERMANN, Bruce
hal.structure.identifierDepartment of Anatomy and Neurosciences, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam
dc.contributor.authorSCHOONHEIM, Menno M.
hal.structure.identifierUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health
dc.contributor.authorHETZEL, Scott J.
hal.structure.identifierNeurocentre Magendie : Physiopathologie de la Plasticité Neuronale [U1215 Inserm - UB]
dc.contributor.authorBROCHET, Bruno
hal.structure.identifierDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers University, Newark
dc.contributor.authorDELUCA, John
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-09T15:22:53Z
dc.date.available2023-01-09T15:22:53Z
dc.date.issued2022-02
dc.identifier.issn2211-0348en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/171636
dc.description.abstractEnBackground: People with multiple sclerosis (MS) commonly experience cognitive impairment associated with the disease, but there is currently no agreed-upon operational definition for identifying the presence of that impairment, in either research or clinic contexts. The International MS Cognition Society (IMSCOGS) established a task force to begin to examine this issue and this paper represents the results of an initial pilot investigation. The aim of this paper was to compare two criterion sets to determine how to identify cognitive impairment among people with MS: the general Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-5) Criteria for neurocognitive disorders and criteria derived from existing MS research (scores in two domains fall 1.5 standard deviations below normative controls). Methods: Two hundred and ten people with MS presented for a brief cognitive evaluation in an MS Multidisciplinary Clinic at a midwestern academic medical center in the United States. Participants were generally middle aged (average 51.5 years), female (73.8%), and white (93.3%). McNemar's test was computed to compare the number of individuals whose cognitive test score performance was deemed cognitively normal, mildly impaired, or more significantly impaired. Results: DSM-5 criteria classified 87.2% of the sample as cognitively impaired, where 66.7% were more mildly impaired and 20.5% more significantly impaired. By contrast, research-based criteria classified 63.3% of the sample as cognitively impaired, with 49.5% as mildly impaired and 13.8% as more significantly impaired. Conclusions: These findings indicate that compared to research criteria, the DSM-5 criteria classified far more people with MS as having cognitive impairment secondary to the disease. The paper discusses the potential benefits and drawbacks of the two diagnostic methods, highlighting that more work will be needed in order to establish a standardized and validated method for characterizing these impairments. © 2022
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subject.enCognitive impairment
dc.subject.enDiagnosis of cognitive impairment
dc.subject.enDementia
dc.title.enComparing diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of neurocognitive disorders in multiple sclerosis
dc.title.alternativeMult Scler Relat Disorden_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.msard.2021.103479en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Neurosciences [q-bio.NC]en_US
dc.identifier.pubmed35033839en_US
bordeaux.journalMultiple Sclerosis and Related Disordersen_US
bordeaux.page103479en_US
bordeaux.volume58en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesNeurocentre Magendie - U1215en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionINSERMen_US
bordeaux.teamRelations glie-neuroneen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.identifier.funderIDEurostarsen_US
bordeaux.identifier.funderIDZonMwen_US
bordeaux.identifier.funderIDAmsterdam Neuroscienceen_US
bordeaux.identifier.funderIDAtara Biotherapeuticsen_US
bordeaux.identifier.funderIDBiogenen_US
bordeaux.identifier.funderIDCelgeneen_US
bordeaux.identifier.funderIDBMS College of Engineeringen_US
bordeaux.identifier.funderIDMercken_US
bordeaux.identifier.funderIDMedDay Pharmaceuticalsen_US
bordeaux.identifier.funderIDSanofi Genzymeen_US
bordeaux.identifier.funderIDNovartis Foundationen_US
bordeaux.identifier.funderIDRocheen_US
hal.identifierhal-03931312
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2023-01-09T15:22:56Z
hal.exporttrue
dc.rights.ccCC BY-NC-NDen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Multiple%20Sclerosis%20and%20Related%20Disorders&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=58&rft.spage=103479&rft.epage=103479&rft.eissn=2211-0348&rft.issn=2211-0348&rft.au=HANCOCK,%20Laura%20M.&HERMANN,%20Bruce&SCHOONHEIM,%20Menno%20M.&HETZEL,%20Scott%20J.&BROCHET,%20Bruno&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée