Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorGENDARME, Sebastien
dc.contributor.authorPAIRON, Jean-Claude
dc.contributor.authorANDUJAR, Pascal
hal.structure.identifierCentre de recherche Cardio-Thoracique de Bordeaux [Bordeaux] [CRCTB]
dc.contributor.authorLAURENT, Francois
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorBROCHARD, Patrick
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorDELVA, Fleur
dc.contributor.authorCLIN, Benedicte
dc.contributor.authorGISLARD, Antoine
dc.contributor.authorPARIS, Christophe
dc.contributor.authorTHAON, Isabelle
dc.contributor.authorGOUSSAULT, Helene
dc.contributor.authorCANOUI-POITRINE, Florence
dc.contributor.authorCHOUAID, Christos
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-27T09:43:45Z
dc.date.available2022-10-27T09:43:45Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-24
dc.identifier.issn2072-6694 (Print) 2072-6694 (Linking)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/170124
dc.description.abstractEnBackground: The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) and NELSON study opened the debate on the relevance of lung cancer (LC) screening in subjects exposed to occupational respiratory carcinogens. This analysis reported the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) of an organized LC screening program for an asbestos-exposed population. Methods: Using Markov modelization, individuals with asbestos exposure were either monitored without intervention or annual low-dose thoracic computed-tomography (LDTCT) scan LC screening. LC incidence came from a prospective observational cohort of subjects with occupational asbestos exposure. The intervention parameters were those of the NLST study. Utilities and LC-management costs came from published reports. A sensitivity analysis evaluated different screening strategies. Results: The respective quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gain, supplementary costs and ICER [95% confidence interval] were: 0.040 [0.010-0.065] QALY, 6900 [3700-11,800] € and 170,000 [75,000-645,000] €/QALY for all asbestos-exposed subjects; and 0.144 [0.071-0.216] QALY, 13,000 [5700-26,800] € and 90,000 [35,000-276,000] €/QALY for smokers with high exposure. When screening was based on biennial LDTCT scans, the ICER was 45,000 [95% CI: 15,000-116,000] €/QALY. Conclusions: Compared to the usual ICER thresholds, biennial LDTCT scan LC screening for smokers with high occupational exposure to asbestos is acceptable and preferable to annual scans.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subject.enLung neoplasms
dc.subject.enScreening
dc.subject.enOccupational diseases
dc.subject.enAsbestos
dc.subject.enCost-effectiveness
dc.title.enCost-Effectiveness of an Organized Lung Cancer Screening Program for Asbestos-Exposed Subjects
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/cancers14174089en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed36077626en_US
bordeaux.journalCancersen_US
bordeaux.volume14en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219en_US
bordeaux.issue17en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionINSERMen_US
bordeaux.teamEPICENE_BPHen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-03783819
hal.version1
hal.exportfalse
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Cancers&rft.date=2022-08-24&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=17&rft.eissn=2072-6694%20(Print)%202072-6694%20(Linking)&rft.issn=2072-6694%20(Print)%202072-6694%20(Linking)&rft.au=GENDARME,%20Sebastien&PAIRON,%20Jean-Claude&ANDUJAR,%20Pascal&LAURENT,%20Francois&BROCHARD,%20Patrick&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée